LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  April 3, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Ron Wilson, Chair            IN RE:  House Bill No. 1321, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
          Committee on Licensing & Administrative Procedures                              By: Uher
          House
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB1321 ( Relating 
to the regulation of the practice of engineering; providing 
penalties.) this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB1321-Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
positive impact of $56,700 to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
This bill would  amend  the Texas Engineering Practice Act (Article 
3271a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) by updating definitions 
and allowable enforcement actions under the act, and by providing 
the Board of Professional Registration for Professional Engineers 
with the authority to issue administrative penalties and fines.

The 
bill would be effective upon passage.  
 
Methodolgy
 
The estimated gain in revenue is derived from the new administrative 
penalties that would be authorized by the bill and the number 
of violations in fiscal 1996.  The agency anticipates additional 
costs to implement the bill due to hearings and travel associated 
with processing the administrative penalties allowed by the 
bill.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Probable Revenue   
            Savings/(Cost)     Gain/(Loss) from                                                           
            from General       General Revenue                                                            
            Revenue Fund       Fund                                                                       
            0001               0001                                                                        
       1998         ($12,150)           $40,500                                                      
       1998          (12,150)            40,500                                                      
       2000          (12,150)            40,500                                                      
       2001          (12,150)            40,500                                                      
       2002          (12,150)            40,500                                                      
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998              $28,350
               1999               28,350
               2000               28,350
               2001               28,350
               2002               28,350
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,TH