LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  May 12, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable James E. "Pete" Laney            IN RE:  House Bill No. 1387, As Passed 2nd House
          Speaker of the House                Gray
          House of Representatives
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB1387 ( Relating 
to the continuation and functions of the Automobile Theft Prevention 
Authority.) this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB1387-As Passed 2nd House
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
positive impact of $6,474,000 to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         

         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The bill would allow for the continuation of the Automobile 
Theft Prevention Authority (ATPA). In addition, the bill would 
require insurers to pay their annual assessment fee on a semiannual 
basis. 
 
Methodolgy
 
The assessment paid by insurers for the use by the ATPA would 
be made on the following schedule; the August 1, 1998 payment 
would be applicable to policies issued, delivered, or renewed 
from January 1 through June 30 of the same calendar year; and 
the March 1, 1999 payment would be applicable to policies issued, 
delivered, or renewed from July 1 through December 31 of the 
previous calendar year.  The March 1, 1998 payment would be 
governed under current law and would apply to all of calendar 
1997

The Comptroller has estimated that net fiscal effect 
of the bill would be to generate a one-time "speed-up" of January 
through June 1998 assessments (which would otherwise not be 
received until the next fiscal year, in March, 1999) in August 
1998.  The gain would occur for fiscal 1998 without increasing 
the amount owed by the industry.  The gain in fiscal 1999 would 
come about because of the increased interest earnings on the 
August 1998 semiannual payment.  In each succeeding fiscal year 
thereafter, however, there would be minor interest losses because 
the March collection would be cut in half, and interest earnings 
on the August payment would accrue for only one month before 
the fiscal year closed.  

The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue   
            Gain/(Loss) from                                                                              
            General Revenue                                                                               
            Fund                                                                                          
            0001                                                                                           
       1998        $6,180,000                                                                        
       1998           294,000                                                                        
       2000          (26,000)                                                                        
       2001          (21,000)                                                                        
       2002          (28,000)                                                                        
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 

 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998           $6,180,000
               1999              294,000
               2000             (26,000)
               2001             (21,000)
               2002             (28,000)
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   304   Comptroller of Public Accounts
                                         601   Department of Transportation
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,JD ,PE ,ML