LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session April 4, 1997 TO: Honorable Ron Wilson, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 1445, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted Committee on Licensing & Administrative Procedures By: Gray House Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB1445 ( Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Racing Commission and to the transfer of certain commission functions to the Texas Department of Commerce; providing penalties.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB1445-Committee Report 1st House, Substituted Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net positive impact of $460,824 to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. Fiscal Analysis HB 1445 would continue the Texas Racing Commission through August 31, 2005 and make several changes to the enabling statute. The Texas Racing Commission is subject to the provisions of the Texas Sunset Act, and unless continued by the 75th Legislature, will be abolished September 1,1997. The amount set forth for funding the Texas Racing Commission in the General Appropriations Act, as introduced, is $9,430,711 in fiscal year 1998 and $9,374,318 in fiscal year 1999, and would be contingent upon the passage of HB 1445 or similar legislation. The appropriations would be financed from a dedicated account (0597) within General Revenue and would provide for 74 employees. Sections 1 through 12 of the bill relate to definitions, commission membership, regulatory authority, and operational practices of the commission and other law enforcement personnel. No fiscal impact is anticipated from the implementation of these sections. Section 13 of the bill would require the Texas Racing Commission to employ all racetrack stewards and judges. This section would result in increased cost to the state as specified below. Section 14 of the bill concerns recognizing racing organizations, licensing requirements, including the posting of security to ensure payment of fees and charges to the state or commission related to pari-mutuel racing. This section also expands the regulatory and investigative authority of the executive secretary and authorizes the commission to assess an administrative penalties for violations of cease and desist orders. Gains to general revenue could result from such penalties, but neither the frequency nor the amount of the penalties can be estimated. Sections 15 and 16 concern certificates of licensure and qualifications for licensure including fingerprinting for conducting a criminal background check. Section 17 of the bill authorizes the commission to set fees to cover the cost of conducting a criminal background check and would require the commission to reimburse the Department of Public Safety for such costs. Section 28 of the bill authorizes the commission to recoup these costs. Sections 18 through 22 concern commission oversight of racing related activities. Section 21 would authorize the commission to suspend a racetrack license if the commission determines that the track is being operated in a manner that is a threat to public health, safety or welfare. No fiscal impact is anticipated from implementation of these sections. Section 23 of the bill would change the distribution of the simulcast pari-mutuel pool by setting aside 0.25, or an estimated $900,000 per year, for the Racing Commission instead of the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse to be used for the repayment of the Racing Commission's loan from general revenue. These funds are currently being collected and certified and would not constitute a gain to state revenue. No fiscal impact is anticipated from implementation of this section. Sections 24 through 27 would provide the commission with additional authority to oversee the Texas Bred Incentive Program, licensing requirements and examination requirements for licensure. No fiscal impact is anticipated from implementation of these sections. Section 28 of the bill would authorize the commission to recoup the cost of license fees, including criminal background checks. Sections 29 to 30 of the bill concern the terms of licensure, reciprocity with other states. No fiscal impact is anticipated from implementation of these sections. Sections 31 and 32 of the bill relate to the adoption of regulations for the Texas Bred Incentive program. No fiscal impact is anticipated from implementation of these sections. Section 33 of the bill would permit cross-species simulcast wagering, subject to agreements between certain racetracks. The potential exists for increased revenue should such agreements occur; however, neither the Racing Commission nor the Comptroller of Public Accounts can estimate the amounts of revenue at the present time. Section 34 of the bill relates to the prohibition of wagering by minors. No fiscal impact is anticipated from implementation of this section. Section 35 of the bill relates to payment of money not claimed to the commission. No fiscal impact is anticipated from implementation of this section. Sections 36 to 39 relate to liabilities and defense to prosecution, definitions of criminal activity and penalties. No fiscal impact is anticipated from implementation of these sections of the bill. Section 40 of the bill would continue the commission until September 1, 2005. The fiscal impact of this section is detailed below. Section 41 of the bill would amend Section 481.172, Government Code, to enable the Texas Department of Commerce to promote and encourage the horse racing and greyhound racing industry. Section 42 of the bill would repeal Sections 2.07, 3.01, 11.04(d), 15.02, and 18.02, Texas Racing Act (Article 179e, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) in conformance with other provisions of the bill. The repealed sections are as follows: Section 2.07 concerns prohibited conduct by commission members. Section 3.01 concerns commission sections and divided jurisdiction of commission members Section 11.04 defines violations under this Section 11.04 as an offense. Section 15.02 defines person as the meaning assigned by the Penal Code. Section 18.02 concerns Application of Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act. No fiscal impact is anticipated from implementation of these sections. Section 43 and 44 of the bill concern effective dates for qualifications of commission members and criminal offenses. No fiscal impact is anticipated from implementation of these sections. Section 45 of the bill suspends the rule requiring bills to be read on three separate days. Methodolgy Section 13 of the bill would require that the Racing Commission employ all racetrack stewards and judges. Currently, only one of the three top regulatory officials is employed by the commission. The other two are employed by the racetrack. The Racing Commission estimates that this would increase the number of FTEs by 11 in fiscal year 1998 and 10 in fiscal year 1999, with 10 each year thereafter. The Racing Commission estimates that the addition of this number of FTEs and related operating costs would result in an increase of $794,402 in fiscal year 1998 and $764,452 in fiscal year 1999 and each year thereafter. These costs would be offset by additional fees collected from the racetrack. Section 28 of the bill would require the Racing Commission to collect licensing fees to cover the costs of criminal history checks conducted by the Department of Public Safety, where the costs are incurred. The cost is $15 per card and the cost of a federal criminal history check is $24, for a total of $39 per new license application. Every five years a federal criminal history check is conducted, but not a state criminal history check. Based on projected numbers of new licensees and renewing licensees, the Racing Commission estimates that it will collect $229,392 in fiscal year 1998 and $231,432 in fiscal years 1999 - 2002. Currently, the Department of Public Safety absorbs some of the cost, and bills the Racing Commission for a portion of the cost. However, the Racing Commission is not currently collecting fees for the full amount, thus the net impact to the state would be a gain to General Revenue Dedicated Fund Account 099 of approximately $230,000 per year. The probable fiscal implications of Implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Five Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Probable Revenue Probable Revenue Change in Number Savings/(Cost) Gain/(Loss) from Gain/(Loss) from of State from Texas Texas Racing Operators and Employees from Racing Commission Chauffeurs FY 1997 Commission Account/ License Account/ Account/ GR-Dedicated GR-Dedicated GR-Dedicated Fund 099 0597 0597 0001 1998 ($794,402) $794,402 $229,392 11.0 1998 (764,451) 764,451 231,432 10.0 2000 (764,451) 764,451 231,432 10.0 2001 (764,451) 764,451 231,432 10.0 2002 (764,451) 764,451 231,432 10.0 Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds: The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds during each of the first five years is estimated as follows: Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative) General Revenue Related Funds Funds 1998 $229,392 1999 231,432 2000 231,432 2001 231,432 2002 231,432 Similar annual fiscal implications These impacts would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Agencies: 405 Department of Public Safety 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts 476 Racing Commission 116 Sunset Advisory Commission 465 Department of Commerce LBB Staff: JK ,TH ,JA