LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  April 4, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Senfronia Thompson, Chair            IN RE:  House Bill No. 1516, Committee Report 1st House, as amended
          Committee on Judicial Affairs                              By: Thompson
          House
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB1516 ( Relating 
to the creation of a record keeping system for assisting law 
enforcement in the location of missing children.) this office 
has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB1516-Committee Report 1st House, as amended
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
negative impact of $(969,464) to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The bill would require the Department of Public Safety to provide 
information about missing children to the Texas Education Agency, 
to each school district, open-enrollment charter school, private 
school, and each licensed child care facility in the state, 
as well as to the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the Department 
of Health.
 
Methodolgy
 
Approximately 124 children under the age of 11 are reported 
missing on a monthly basis.  It is estimated that a total of 
30,000 notifications would be required to be made.  Six additional 
full-time equivalents, including four records technicians and 
two administrative technicians, would be added.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Change in Number   
            Savings/(Cost)     of State                                                                   
            from General       Employees from                                                             
            Revenue Fund       FY 1997                                                                    
            0001                                                                                           
       1998        ($506,932)               6.0                                                      
       1998         (462,532)               6.0                                                      
       2000         (462,532)               6.0                                                      
       2001         (462,532)               6.0                                                      
       2002         (462,532)               6.0                                                      
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998           ($506,932)
               1999            (462,532)
               2000            (462,532)
               2001            (462,532)
               2002            (462,532)
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government 
is anticipated.  It is estimated that some costs would be incurred 
by local registration districts; however, the costs will be 
distributed among approximately 600 locations.  Large metropolitan 
areas such as Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston, and San Antonio would 
be disproportionately affected.  Some local areas which are 
not automated would have higher costs.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,PE ,KF