LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
April 23, 1997
TO: Honorable Warren Chisum, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 1582, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Committee on Environmental Regulation By: Hirschi
House
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB1582 ( Relating
to permit and notice requirements for applicators of aquatic
pesticides in certain bodies of water.) this office has detemined
the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB1582-Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions
of the bill.
The Texas Department of Agriculture estimates
its net fiscal impact at $0, since the bill would allow a fee
to be charged to cover costs incurred. Texas Parks and Wildlife
Department has indicated that the bill will not impose enough
additional responsibilities on the department to create a significant
fiscal impact.
The Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission states that provisions of the bill requiring the
commission to rule on possible contamination of drinking water
sources by proposed pesticide applications would increase costs.
The commission estimates the bill's provisions would require
two new FTEs; the positions would be Environmental Quality Specialists,
and the annual cost of salaries and benefits would exceed $100,000.
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government
is anticipated.
Source: Agencies:
LBB Staff: JK ,BB