LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session April 4, 1997 TO: Honorable Barry Telford, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 1700 Committee on Pensions and Investments By: Rangel House Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB1700 ( Relating to group health coverage for school district employees.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB1700-As Introduced Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net negative impact of $(2,164,000) to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. Fiscal Analysis Under current law, each school district must make available to its employees health coverage that is comparable to the basic health coverage provided to state employees under the Texas Employees Uniform Group Insurance Benefits Act. HB1700 transfers the responsibility of certification of compliance from the school districts to the TRS executive director. Each district must report to the executive director that its plan is substantially similar to the state employees' plan, and the report must be provided not later than November 1 of each year. In making the determination that a district's plan is comparable, the executive director of TRS must examine the entity underwriting the district's plan, the costs paid by the employees, the costs paid by the employer, the schedule of benefits, and the length of the period that the provider has offered coverage in a district. If the executive director finds that a district is not in compliance, that information shall be reported to the district and to the LBB. In addition, the executive director must report to the Legislature on the status of each district's plan by January 1 of odd-numbered years. Methodolgy TRS projects that much of the analysis required by the bill would be performed by the system's consulting actuary. Certification of districts offering fully insured plans is expected to require very little time. For districts that are self-funded or provide health coverage as part of a cafeteria plan, the certification is expected to be more time-consuming. On average, TRS estimates that the cost of each analysis would be $1,000 per district, based on an hourly billing rate of the actuary of $200-250. There are 1,082 districts in the state, so the total annual cost to the General Revenue Fund is estimated to be $1,082,000. The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Five Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 0001 1998 ($1,082,000) 1998 (1,082,000) 2000 (1,082,000) 2001 (1,082,000) 2002 (1,082,000) Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds: The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds during each of the first five years is estimated as follows: Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative) General Revenue Related Funds Funds 1998 ($1,082,000) 1999 (1,082,000) 2000 (1,082,000) 2001 (1,082,000) 2002 (1,082,000) Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Agencies: 323 Teacher Retirement System and Optional Retirement Program LBB Staff: JK ,PE ,SC