LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  March 26, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Toby Goodman, Chair            IN RE:  House Bill No. 1826
          Committee on Juvenile Justice and Family Issues                              By: Goodman
          House
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB1826 ( Relating 
to the Department of Protective and Regulatory Services,  the 
 protection of children from abuse and neglect, and the  conservatorship 
of children.) this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB1826-As Introduced
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
positive impact of $10,677,164 to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The bill would amend numerous provisions in the Family Code 
and the Education Code relating to the protection of children 
from abuse and neglect, and the roles and responsibilities of 
the Department of Protective and Regulatory Services.

Implementation 
of several provisions in the bill would have no significant 
fiscal impact.  These include provisions that would add new 
grounds for the involuntary termination of parental rights; 
exempt the department from paying fees to obtain medical records 
during an investigation; allow the department to pay funeral 
expenses for foster children who die in conservatorship; and 
require the Board of Protective and Regulatory Services to adopt 
rules implementing a program of cooperative mediation services. 
 They also include provisions that would allow the department 
to recover the cost of foster care from the estate of a child 
or parent.

A potential exists for increased costs due to 
implementation of several other provisions in the bill, but 
this would be dependent on board rules and agency implementation 
policies.  The provisions that could increase costs would remove 
a cap on the total amount of foster care payments, including 
medical care; remove limitations on medical care payments; allow 
the department to make protective foster care payments for a 
broader range of children; and allow the Board of Protective 
and Regulatory Services to adopt rules establishing criteria 
and guidelines for the payment of foster care, and for the care 
of children who reach age 18 in conservatorship and continue 
to attend school regularly through age 21.

Implementation 
of several provisions relating to permanency planning for children 
in the department's temporary managing conservatorship would 
have a significant fiscal impact.  These provisions would require 
the court to dismiss a suit filed by the department affecting 
the parent-child relationship on the first Monday after the 
first anniversary of the child's placement in temporary managing 
conservatorship.  The court could extend the department's temporary 
managing conservatorship for up to 180 days under certain circumstances. 
 The effective date for these provisions would be September 
1, 1997, and the change in law would apply to suits filed before 
the effective date.
 
Methodolgy
 
The provisions relating to permanency planning for children 
in temporary managing conservatorship would significantly increase 
the workload of the department's child protective services program 
and legal staff.  It is assumed that the workload increase would 
be heaviest in fiscal year 1998, when the department would implement 
new permanency planning procedures and begin moving a backlog 
of about 3,500 foster children who have been in conservatorship 
for 12 or more months through the court system in preparation 
for a final court order.

The cost of the additional workload 
would be more than offset by a savings in foster care and other 
purchased services.  The department estimates that 337 children 
would leave the foster care system during fiscal year 1998 due 
to implementation of the new permanency planning provisions. 
 The number of children leaving the system after 1998 would 
rise steadily, from 1,693 in 1999 to nearly 2,500 in the year 
2002.  This would result in a five-year savings of more than 
$110 million in foster care payments and $1.7 million in other 
purchased service payments.  The department also estimates that 
the number of children receiving adoption subsidy payments would 
increase by about 150 over five years due to implementation 
of the bill's provisions, and foster care savings have been 
adjusted accordingly.

Implementation of the bill's provisions 
would require additional child protective service workers and 
legal staff to handle the new permanency planning requirements. 
 These costs have been adjusted for a gradual implementation 
of the program in 1998.  The cost estimate uses federal revenue 
from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. 
 In the event that TANF funds are unavailable for allocation, 
General Revenue may need to be substituted.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Probable           Probable           Probable           Change in Number   
            Savings/(Cost)     Savings/(Cost)     Savings/(Cost)     Savings/(Cost)     of State          
            from General       from General       from Federal Funds from Federal Funds Employees from    
            Revenue Fund       Revenue Fund                                             FY 1997           
            0001               0001               0555               0555                                  
       1998      ($4,604,926)        $3,156,825      ($3,417,593)        $1,641,687             180.0
       1998       (2,377,816)        14,503,081       (1,764,721)         7,542,235              95.0
       2000       (2,476,691)        16,460,143       (1,838,101)         8,559,992              97.0
       2001       (2,676,583)        18,764,019       (1,986,453)         9,758,108             103.0
       2002       (2,778,174)        21,203,445       (2,061,850)        11,026,716             104.0
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998         ($1,448,101)
               1999           12,125,265
               2000           13,983,452
               2001           16,087,436
               2002           18,425,271
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
Implementation of the bill's provisions would significantly 
increase the workload of counties that provide legal representation 
for children in the temporary managing conservatorship of the 
Department of Protective and Regulatory Services.  The department 
estimates that the additional workload would cause local governments 
to hire additional attorneys at a cost of $7 million statewide 
during the first two years of the bill's implementation.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   501   Department of Health
                                         405   Department of Public Safety
                                         530   Department of Protective and Regulatory Services
                                         324   Department of Human Services
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,CB ,NM