LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session May 17, 1997 TO: Honorable James E. "Pete" Laney IN RE: House Bill No. 1855, As Passed 2nd House Speaker of the House Eiland House of Representatives Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB1855 ( relating to sales tax exemption for items used in manufacturing tangible personal property for ultimate sale) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB1855-As Passed 2nd House Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net positive impact of $128,234,000 to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. Fiscal Analysis The bill would amend Section 151.318 of the Tax Code, relating to the sales tax exemption for certain property used in manufacturing. The bill would limit the exemption in Subsection (a)(2) by specifying that, to qualify for exemption, tangible personal property must be directly used or consumed in the actual manufacturing process and must directly make or cause a chemical or physical change to the product being manufactured for ultimate sale. Certain items of tangible personal property used in the generation of electricity, chilled water, or steam, or to power equipment would be eligible for exemption. In addition, the bill would clarify that certain provisions of Section 151.318 would not apply to semiconductor fabrication cleanrooms and equipment. The bill would specify that intraplant transportation equipment (already excluded from the exemption under current law) would be defined to include those items of intraplant transportation equipment used to move a product or raw material in connection with the manufacturing process. Piping and conveyor systems would be identified specifically as intraplant transportation equipment that would not qualify for the exemption. Piping, however, which is a component part of an exempt item of machinery, would not be taxable. Machinery and equipment, or supplies used to maintain or store tangible personal property would not be eligible for exemption. The bill would specify that any taxpayer claiming an exemption under this section of the Tax Code would have the burden of proof that the exemption claimed was applicable. No exclusion under Section 151.318(c) of the Tax Code would be applicable. Portions of Section 151.318 relating to the phase-in of the manufacturing machinery and equipment exemption (completed in 1994) would be repealed, as they are no longer necessary. The bill would take effect October 1, 1997. Methodolgy The bill would effectively reverse two recent court decisions, Tyler Pipe v. Sharp and Chevron Chemical v. Sharp, that resulted in an expansion of the sales tax exemption for manufacturing equipment, and it would codify Comptroller policy as it existed before those decisions. The fiscal impact on state and local revenues would consist only of the prospective gain to the tax base; the State of Texas would still be liable for refunds of taxes previously paid on the types of items addressed by the Tyler Pipe and Chevron cases for the periods preceding the effective date of the bill. The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Five Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Probable Revenue Probable Revenue Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) to Gain/(Loss) to Gain/(Loss) to Gain/(Loss) to General Revenue Cities Transit Counties and Fund Authorities Special Districts 0001 LCL-CITY LCL-TRANSIT LCL-COUNTY 1998 $56,361,000 $8,627,000 $3,512,000 $1,010,000 1998 71,873,000 12,223,000 4,976,000 1,432,000 2000 83,493,000 14,200,000 5,781,000 1,663,000 2001 86,289,000 14,675,000 5,975,000 1,719,000 2002 89,179,000 15,167,000 6,175,000 1,776,000 Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds: The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds during each of the first five years is estimated as follows: Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative) General Revenue Related Funds Funds 1998 $56,361,000 1999 71,873,000 2000 83,493,000 2001 86,289,000 2002 89,179,000 Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. Source: Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: JK ,RR ,SM