LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  April 21, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Fred M. Bosse, Chair            IN RE:  House Bill No. 2018, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
          Committee on Land and Resource Management                              By: Maxey
          House
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB2018 ( Relating 
to the allocation of space to state agencies.) this office has 
detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB2018-Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
         

Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a 
net positive impact of $752,000 to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         

         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The bill would amend the Government Code to require the General 
Services Commission (GSC) to study the space requirements of 
state agencies that occupy administrative office space. Administrative 
office space would include state-owned administrative office 
space and administrative office space leased from other sources. 
 The bill would exclude office space used by a health and human 
services agency for the delivery of direct client services or 
space located in a county with a population of 75,000 or less. 
 

The bill would require each state agency to conduct an 
on-site space analysis at each agency location and to develop 
a space allocation plan using rules developed by GSC.  Based 
on a review of the space allocation plans submitted by state 
agencies, GSC would be required:  to identify areas of the state 
in which more than one state agency occupied administrative 
office space and that have the greatest potential for cost savings; 
and, to evaluate the feasibility of colocating administrative 
office space within the same local labor market. 

The bill 
would require GSC to conduct studies at least once during each 
state fiscal biennium on the agency s own efforts to colocate 
administrative office space and on the space usage of state 
agencies in Travis County.  Based on the GSC report of space 
usage in Travis County, the bill would require the Comptroller 
to reduce appropriations, by October 1, 1998, to  each affected 
agency by an amount equal to the lease costs that would have 
been incurred for the remainder of the biennium if the state 
agency had occupied the same amount of administrative office 
space, less the moving costs and expenses identified by GSC. 
 This provision of the bill would expire August 31, 1999.
 
Methodolgy
 
The bill would require the Comptroller to reduce appropriations 
in the 1998-99 biennium for certain agencies that experience 
colocation savings associated with office space in Travis County. 
 Estimated savings are based on reduced lease costs resulting 
from agencies in Travis County that could eliminate or reduce 
lease space by complying with the 153 square feet standard. 
Estimated moving costs were subtracted from the lease savings. 
 This explains the cost for fiscal year 1998: moving costs in 
that year would exceed lease savings.  Savings occurring after 
fiscal year 1999 would depend on the extent to which additional 
opportunities for colocation are identified and agency appropriations 
are reduced as a result; but it is assumed that the savings 
identified for fiscal year 1999 would continue into future fiscal 
years.

Based on an analysis of expenditures by state agencies 
for rental space and operating expenses, the Comptroller found 
that 79 percent of expenditures are paid from general revenue, 
while the remaining 21 percent are paid out of other funds. 
 Therefore, the savings shown below are split between general 
revenue and other funds accordingly.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Probable           
            Savings/(Cost)     Savings/(Cost)                                                             
            from General       from Other - Other                                                         
            Revenue Fund                                                                                  
            0001               OTHER-OTH                                                                   
       1998         ($25,000)          ($7,000)                                                      
       1998           777,000           207,000                                                      
       2000           777,000           207,000                                                      
       2001           777,000           207,000                                                      
       2002           777,000           207,000                                                      
 


 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998            ($25,000)
               1999              777,000
               2000              777,000
               2001              777,000
               2002              777,000
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.

The bill would 
amend the Government Code to require the General Services Commission 
(GSC) to study the space requirements of state agencies that 
occupy administrative office space. Administrative office space 
would include state-owned administrative office space and administrative 
office space leased from other sources.  The bill would exclude 
office space used by a health and human services agency for 
the delivery of direct client services or space located in a 
county with a population of 75,000 or less.  

The bill would 
require each state agency to conduct an on-site space analysis 
at each agency location and to develop a space allocation plan 
using rules developed by GSC.  Based on a review of the space 
allocation plans submitted by state agencies, GSC would be required 
to identify areas of the state in which more than one state 
agency occupied administrative office space and that had the 
greatest potential for cost savings and to evaluate the feasibility 
of colocating administrative office space within the same local 
labor market. 

The bill would require GSC to conduct studies 
at least once each state fiscal biennium on the agency s own 
efforts to colocate administrative office space and on the space 
usage of state agencies in Travis County.  Based on the GSC 
report of space usage in Travis County, the bill would require 
the Comptroller to reduce appropriation, by October 1, 1998, 
to  each affected agency by an amount equal to the lease costs 
that would have been incurred for the remainder of the biennium 
if the state agency had occupied the same amount of administrative 
office space, less the moving costs and expenses identified 
by GSC.  This provision of the bill would expire August 31, 
1999.

The bill would require the Comptroller to reduce appropriations 
in the 1998-99 biennium for certain agencies that experience 
colocation savings associated with office space in Travis County. 
 Estimated savings are based on reduced lease costs resulting 
from agencies in Travis County that could eliminate or reduce 
lease space by complying with the 153 square feet standard. 
Estimated moving costs were subtracted from the lease savings. 
 This explains the cost for fiscal year 1998: moving costs in 
that year would exceed lease savings.  Savings occurring after 
fiscal year 1999 would depend on the extent to which additional 
opportunities for colocation are identified and agency appropriations 
are reduced as a result; but it is assumed that the savings 
identified for fiscal year 1999 would continue into future fiscal 
years.

Based on an analysis of expenditures by state agencies 
for rental space and operating expenses, the Comptroller found 
that 79 percent of expenditures are paid from general revenue, 
while the remaining 21 percent are paid out of other funds. 
 Therefore, the savings shown below are split between general 
revenue and other funds accordingly.
          
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   304   Comptroller of Public Accounts
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,BB ,RN