LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session March 27, 1997 TO: Honorable Toby Goodman, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 2073 Committee on Juvenile Justice and Family Issues By: Hightower House Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB2073 ( Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB2073-As Introduced Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in no fiscal implication through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. Fiscal Implications The bill would provide for the continuation of the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission for the standard 12-year Sunset review cycle. In addition, the bill would require the agency, jointly with the Texas Youth Commission, to develop voluntary county pilot programs to access state juvenile correctional funds to provide services to delinquent youth at the community level. The bill would also require the use of sound performance-based contracting practices by county juvenile probation departments and the application for, when cost-effective, federal Medicaid benefits. Finally, the bill would require county juvenile probation departments to use a standard assessment tool, approved by the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission, for the initial assessment of children in the juvenile justice system and to adopt specific standards and performance measures for county juvenile probation departments. Methodology The Texas Juvenile Probation Commission is subject to the provisions of the Texas Sunset Act. Funding for the agency is included in the General Appropriations Act, as introduced. The appropriations would be financed from the General Revenue Fund and would provide $65,034,480 annually for fiscal years 1998 and 1999, providing for 36 employees each fiscal year. Participating units of local government in the pilot programs would benefit by having greater access to state juvenile correctional funds allowing participating units to use these funds for providing juvenile probation services at the community level. Greater access to state juvenile correctional funds will not have an impact on the state because local units would either reduce the number of youth committed, or pay for the commitment of a youth, to the Commission. No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Agencies: 665 Juvenile Probation Commission 116 Sunset Advisory Commission LBB Staff: JK ,CB ,RT