LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
March 27, 1997
TO: Honorable Toby Goodman, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 2073
Committee on Juvenile Justice and Family Issues By: Hightower
House
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB2073 ( Relating
to the continuation and functions of the Texas Juvenile Probation
Commission.) this office has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB2073-As Introduced
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in no fiscal
implication through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions
of the bill.
Fiscal Implications
The bill would provide
for the continuation of the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission
for the standard 12-year Sunset review cycle. In addition,
the bill would require the agency, jointly with the Texas Youth
Commission, to develop voluntary county pilot programs to access
state juvenile correctional funds to provide services to delinquent
youth at the community level. The bill would also require the
use of sound performance-based contracting practices by county
juvenile probation departments and the application for, when
cost-effective, federal Medicaid benefits. Finally, the bill
would require county juvenile probation departments to use a
standard assessment tool, approved by the Texas Juvenile Probation
Commission, for the initial assessment of children in the juvenile
justice system and to adopt specific standards and performance
measures for county juvenile probation departments.
Methodology
The
Texas Juvenile Probation Commission is subject to the provisions
of the Texas Sunset Act. Funding for the agency is included
in the General Appropriations Act, as introduced. The appropriations
would be financed from the General Revenue Fund and would provide
$65,034,480 annually for fiscal years 1998 and 1999, providing
for 36 employees each fiscal year.
Participating units of
local government in the pilot programs would benefit by having
greater access to state juvenile correctional funds allowing
participating units to use these funds for providing juvenile
probation services at the community level. Greater access to
state juvenile correctional funds will not have an impact on
the state because local units would either reduce the number
of youth committed, or pay for the commitment of a youth, to
the Commission.
No significant fiscal implication to units
of local government is anticipated.
Source: Agencies: 665 Juvenile Probation Commission
116 Sunset Advisory Commission
LBB Staff: JK ,CB ,RT