LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
March 17, 1997
TO: Honorable Allen Hightower, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 2074
Committee on Corrections By: Hightower
House
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB2074 ( Relating
to the continuation and functions of the Texas Youth Commission.)
this office has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB2074-As Introduced
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in no fiscal
implication through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions
of the bill.
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would provide for the continuation
of the Texas Youth Commission for the standard 12-year Sunset
review cycle. In addition, the bill would require the Commission,
jointly with the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission, to develop
voluntary county pilot programs that would be eligible to access
state juvenile correctional funds to provide services to delinquent
youth at the community level. State funds made available for
the pilot programs would be offset by either reduced commitments
to the state or the payment by a participating county for the
commitment of a youth to the state. The pilot program would
not be large enough to have a significant impact on Commission
programming for facilities or staff.
The bill would also
require the establishment and use of sound performance-based
contracting practices for residential treatment services and
for the Commission to apply for federal Medicaid benefits when
cost-effective.
Methodology
The Texas Youth Commission
is subject to the provisions of the Texas Sunset Act. Funding
for the agency is included in the General Appropriations Act,
as introduced. The appropriations would be financed from general
revenue, appropriated receipts, interagency contracts, and earned
federal funds and would provide $163,737,624 and $183,779,430
for fiscal years 1998 and 1999 respectively, while providing
for 3,975.5 employees in fiscal year 1998 and 4,399.5 in fiscal
year 1999.
Participating units of local government in the
pilot programs would benefit by having greater access to state
juvenile correctional funds allowing participating units to
use these funds for providing juvenile probation services at
the community level. Greater access to state juvenile correctional
funds will not have an impact on the state because local units
would either reduce the number of youth committed, or pay for
the commitment of a youth, to the Commission.
Source: Agencies: 665 Juvenile Probation Commission
694 Youth Commission
116 Sunset Advisory Commission
LBB Staff: JK ,CB ,RT