LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session March 17, 1997 TO: Honorable Allen Hightower, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 2074 Committee on Corrections By: Hightower House Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB2074 ( Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Youth Commission.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB2074-As Introduced Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in no fiscal implication through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. Fiscal Analysis The bill would provide for the continuation of the Texas Youth Commission for the standard 12-year Sunset review cycle. In addition, the bill would require the Commission, jointly with the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission, to develop voluntary county pilot programs that would be eligible to access state juvenile correctional funds to provide services to delinquent youth at the community level. State funds made available for the pilot programs would be offset by either reduced commitments to the state or the payment by a participating county for the commitment of a youth to the state. The pilot program would not be large enough to have a significant impact on Commission programming for facilities or staff. The bill would also require the establishment and use of sound performance-based contracting practices for residential treatment services and for the Commission to apply for federal Medicaid benefits when cost-effective. Methodology The Texas Youth Commission is subject to the provisions of the Texas Sunset Act. Funding for the agency is included in the General Appropriations Act, as introduced. The appropriations would be financed from general revenue, appropriated receipts, interagency contracts, and earned federal funds and would provide $163,737,624 and $183,779,430 for fiscal years 1998 and 1999 respectively, while providing for 3,975.5 employees in fiscal year 1998 and 4,399.5 in fiscal year 1999. Participating units of local government in the pilot programs would benefit by having greater access to state juvenile correctional funds allowing participating units to use these funds for providing juvenile probation services at the community level. Greater access to state juvenile correctional funds will not have an impact on the state because local units would either reduce the number of youth committed, or pay for the commitment of a youth, to the Commission. Source: Agencies: 665 Juvenile Probation Commission 694 Youth Commission 116 Sunset Advisory Commission LBB Staff: JK ,CB ,RT