LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
March 14, 1997
TO: Honorable Rene Oliveira, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 2162
Committee on Economic Development By: Oliveira
House
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB2162 ( Relating
to the administration and financing of certain industrial development
corporations.) this office has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB2162-As Introduced
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions
of the bill.
The bill would amend the Development Corporation
Act of 1979 (act) to provide additional flexibility to municipalities
with industrial development corporations. The fiscal impact
on the state and on local governments would vary depending on
which cities and counties enacted taxes under the provisions
of the bill.
METHODOLOGY
The fiscal impact on the state and on local governments
in reduced property tax revenue would vary depending on which
cities enacted the provisions of the bill and converted taxable
property to exempt "public-use property." Article 5190.6, Development
Corporation Act, Section 4B. (k) provides a property tax exemption
for all approved projects owned, used and held by an eligible
municipality. The exemption is based on a provision that defines
all such projects as "public-use property" which is exempt from
ad valorem taxes.
Section 403.302, Government Code, requires
the Comptroller to conduct a property value study to determine
the total taxable value for each school district. Total taxable
value is an element in the state's school funding formula.
Passage of the bill could cause a reduction in a school district's
taxable values reported to the Commissioner of Education by
the Comptroller.
When calculating state aid for public education,
the state must recognize the loss in local property value due
to exemptions granted to qualified organizations within the
school district. Depending on a school district's wealth per
student, this could result in an increased cost to state-funded
public education.
The fiscal impact on the state would depend
on the number and amount of local taxable property removed from
the local tax rolls due to being converted to public-use property,
but it is possible to provide a hypothetical example of such
an impact. In a hypothetical school district that qualifies
for both tier-one and tier-two state aid for public education,
it would cost the state one dollar for each dollar of local
school district property tax revenue loss due to the provisions
of the bill. In such a hypothetical school district in which,
for example, $100 million of taxable property would be converted
to public-use property, the probable cost to General Revenue-related
funds during each fiscal year that the property remained off
the local tax rolls would be $1.5 million, based on a tax rate
of $1.50 per $100 of valuation.
FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact on the state and on local
governments would vary depending on which cities and counties
enacted taxes under the provisions of the bill.
Source: Agencies:
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
465 Department of Commerce
LBB Staff: JK ,TH