LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  May 1, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Kenneth Armbrister, Chair            IN RE:  House Bill No. 2424, As Engrossed
          Committee on State Affairs                              By: Puente
          Senate
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB2424 ( Relating 
to deductions from lottery winnings and compensation of the 
amount of certain child support, taxes, and other payments.) 
this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB2424-As Engrossed
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
negative impact of $(401,212) to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The bill would amend the State Lottery Act to mandate the deduction 
of child support payments from lottery prizes paid over time 
if won by a person owing child support.

The executive director 
of the lottery would be required to deduct the amount of the 
child support owed from the lottery prize winnings paid over 
time if the executive director had been provided a copy of a 
court order, a writ of withholding under Chapter 158 of the 
Family Code, or a notice of child support lien issued under 
the Subchapter G, Chapter 157 of the Family Code.  Any prize 
amount over the amount of child support owed would be paid to 
the claimant.  The executive director would transfer the child 
support revenue to the clerk of the court that issued the order, 
writ, or notice.  The Lottery Commission (commission) would 
adopt the rules necessary to implement this bill.

The bill 
would require the lottery's executive director to deduct the 
amount of certain delinquent tax or other money from compensation 
payments made to a sales agent.  Deductions would be taken: 
 for delinquent tax payments or other money collected by the 
Comptroller, the Texas Workforce Commission, or the Texas Alcoholic 
Beverage Commission; for delinquent child support payments; 
or for a default on a loan made under Chapter 52 or Chapter 
57 of the Education Code.   Any of the sales agent's compensation 
greater than the delinquency owed would be paid to the sales 
agent.  The director would transfer the amount withheld to the 
appropriate agency.  

The bill would require the Attorney 
General, the Comptroller of Public Accounts, the Texas Workforce 
Commission, the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, the Texas 
Higher Education Coordinating Board, and the Texas Guaranteed 
Student Loan Corporation to provide the commission's executive 
director with a report of persons determined to be delinquent.

The 
bill would become effective immediately upon enactment, assuming 
that it received the requisite two-thirds majority votes in 
both houses of the Legislature.  Otherwise, it would become 
effective 90 days after adjournment.
 
Methodolgy
 
The bill would require the Texas Lottery Comission  to modify 
the Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) computer application in 
order to make the required deductions involving sales agents. 
 The TLC estimates this modification will cost $150,000.

The 
commission estimates three additional FTEs would be needed to 
carry out the sales agent collection portion of the bill.  Two 
retailer accountant specialists ($30,000 each) would be needed 
to perform the manual adjustments to sales agents' accounts 
and correspond with sales agents regarding the adjustments. 
 One programmer ($45,000) would be needed to develop and implement 
the modified EFT computer application.
Equipment costs (computer, 
furniture, etc.) for the new staff would total $15,000.  Although 
the initial cost would be out of General Revenue Dedicated Account 
5025, it would ultimately be a cost to the General Reveue Fund 
0001.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Change in Number   
            Savings/(Cost)     of State                                                                   
            from General       Employees from                                                             
            Revenue Fund       FY 1997                                                                    
            0001                                                                                           
       1998        ($269,741)               3.0                                                      
       1998         (131,471)               3.0                                                      
       2000         (131,471)               3.0                                                      
       2001         (131,471)               3.0                                                      
       2002         (131,471)               3.0                                                      
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998           ($269,741)
               1999            (131,471)
               2000            (131,471)
               2001            (131,471)
               2002            (131,471)
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   362   Texas Lottery Commission
                                         304   Comptroller of Public Accounts
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,JD ,PH