LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  April 14, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Clyde Alexander, Chair            IN RE:  House Bill No. 2469
          Committee on Transportation                              By: McReynolds
          House
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB2469 ( Relating 
to the operation of vehicles transporting timber or timber products 
and to the operation of vehicles transporting poles or pipe.) 
this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB2469-As Introduced
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
impact of $0 to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium 
ending August 31, 1999.
         

         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The bill would allow for the adjustment of axle lengths as it 
applies to the transportation of timber and timber products.
 
Methodolgy
 
The Department of Transportation (TxDot) stated that exempting 
timber hauling vehicles from axle spacing requirements would 
result in greater and more frequent overstressing of the state's 
roads and bridges. The department estimates that additional 
damage would be incurred on 4,100, or 11 percent, of the state's 
on system bridges, mostly on Farm-to-Market (FM) roads, and 
7,700, or 85 percent, of the bridges that are off state's highway 
system. TxDot estimated that more of the off system bridges 
would be impacted because they were designed and constructed 
for trucks with a maximum gross weight of 30,000 lbs.

The 
TxDot has estimated the annual on-system bridge damage cost 
to be $199,559 and the off-system cost to be $352,077 for a 
total for both systems of $551,636. In addition, the department 
stated that as bridges become older and damage to the bridges 
accumulates the bridges would need to be inspected more often. 
The department estimated that 2,167 bridges would fall into 
that category and could need one additional inspection per year.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           
            Savings/(Cost)                                                                                
            from State                                                                                    
            Highway Fund                                                                                  
            0006                                                                                           
       1998        ($551,636)                                                                        
       1998         (551,636)                                                                        
       2000         (551,636)                                                                        
       2001         (551,636)                                                                        
       2002         (551,636)                                                                        
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998                   $0
               1999                    0
               2000                    0
               2001                    0
               2002                    0
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government 
is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   405   Department of Public Safety
                                         601   Department of Transportation
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,PE ,ML