LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session April 10, 1997 TO: Honorable Rene Oliveira, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 2500, Committee Report 1st House, as amended Committee on Economic Development By: Oliveira House Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB2500 ( Relating to state agency loan and loan guarantee programs, the creation, administration, and operation of the Texas Economic Development Agency to administer state agency loan and loan guarantee programs and to engage in capital formation initiatives to further the state's economic and agricultural development goals, and to the abolition of the Texas Department of Commerce and the Texas Agricultural Finance Authority.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB2500-Committee Report 1st House, as amended Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net negative impact of $(1,375,000) to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. Fiscal Analysis This bill would abolish the Department of Commerce and the Agricultural Finance Authority and create the Texas Economic Development Agency. The bill would combine the staff of the two abolished agencies to form the new agency. In addition, the bill would transfer program staff and funding involved in economic development activity from several different agencies to the new agency. In addition, the bill would establish the Office of Small Business and the Small Business Ombudsman within the Texas Economic Development Agency. Methodolgy The net impact of transferring existing agency functions to the Texas Economic Development Agency would have a $0 fiscal impact on the state. However, establishing an Office of Small Business and the Small Business Ombudsman would have a fiscal impact because the Department of Commerce is not provided funding to perform these functions. This estimate assumes additional appropriation authority would be provided to the new agency. The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Five Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Change in Number Savings/(Cost) of State from General Employees from Revenue Fund FY 1997 0001 1998 ($750,000) 12.0 1998 (625,000) 12.0 2000 (625,000) 12.0 2001 (650,000) 12.0 2002 (650,000) 12.0 Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds: The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds during each of the first five years is estimated as follows: Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative) General Revenue Related Funds Funds 1998 ($750,000) 1999 (625,000) 2000 (625,000) 2001 (650,000) 2002 (650,000) Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. Source: Agencies: LBB Staff: JK ,TH ,CG