LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
April 23, 1997
TO: Honorable Kenneth Armbrister, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 2644, As Engrossed
Committee on State Affairs By: Telford
Senate
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB2644 ( relating
to systems and programs administered by the Teacher Retirement
System of Texas. ) this office has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB2644-As Engrossed
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would make numerous changes to the Teacher Retirement
System (TRS) governing statutes, change the normal retirement
age plus service eligibility to a rule of 80, and provide a
75% CPI catch-up ad hoc annuity increase for current retirees.
Insurance related provisions include some of the major recommendations
of the Value Health Management study, affecting both the active
and retiree health insurance plans. The bill would require no
increase in state retirement contributions since the current
state plus member contribution is sufficient to pay for the
increased normal costs and amortize the resulting unfunded actuarial
liability within 30 years. However the funding period would
increase by 18.3 years, from 5.8 years to 24.1 years.
The
75% CPI catch-up is the third installment out of a 4 biennia
schedule intended to increase retirement annuity payments so
that they are greater than or equal to the retiree s original
annuity, when adjusted by the CPI. Retirees who retired prior
to 1971 have already caught up , and will receive an additional
5% increase from this provision. The increase in unfunded
actuarial liabilities from this provision is approximately $1.3
billion.
Currently, an active TRS member can retire at age
50 with 30 years of service, age 60 with 20 years of service,
or age 65 with 5 years of service. Section 12 of the bill would
allow unreduced retirement benefits for any combination of age
and service adding up to 80. The increase in unfunded actuarial
liabilities from this provision is approximately $460 million.
This provision also increases the actuarial normal cost of the
plan by 0.07%; at current payroll rates this is an additional
$11 million per year.
Adding salary supplements for drivers
education courses to the base member compensation upon which
benefits are based will add approximately $100 million in unfunded
actuarial liabilities and increase the normal cost of the plan
by 0.03%; at current payroll rates this is an additional $5
million per year.
The active insurance program would lower
the minimum health insurance premiums paid by the employer/district
to 75 percent of the employee only health premium. The bill
would also allow participating districts to have a separate
health insurance plan. These provisions should enhance participation
in the plan. The active and retiree health insurance plans would
be authorized to contract directly with health maintenance organizations
and provider organizations as well as administrators.
TRS
would be authorized to self-fund the retiree health insurance
program. Long-term care could be included as a component of
the current plan, or as a separate insurance plan. To the extent
the cost was not borne by the retirees, this could have a large
cost to the fund. The state would be specifically authorized
to raise its contribution above the current 0.5 percent of payroll
without increasing the active member contribution.
Section
21 of the bill would require TRS to allow retirees to have membership
dues for a nonprofit association of retired school employees
withheld from their monthly annuity payments. TRS would then
be responsible for sending these dues to the nonprofit association
every month.
Adding teacher salary supplements for driver's education courses
to the salary base would require increased contributions. This
salary would be above the state minimum salaries for teachers,
so the increased contributions would be borne by local school
districts. The total cost across the state would be approximately
$360,000 per year. This would be allocated by district in proportion
to the number of driver's education courses taught in that district.
Source: Agencies:
LBB Staff: JK ,JD ,PE ,WM