LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
May 1, 1997
TO: Honorable Senfronia Thompson, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 2697, Committee Report 1st House, as amended
Committee on Judicial Affairs By: Gallego
House
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB2697 ( Relating
to the salary from the state of a district judge who serves
as a local administrative district judge.) this office has detemined
the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB2697-Committee Report 1st House, as amended
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net
negative impact of $(70,000) to General Revenue Related Funds
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions
of the bill.
The bill would provide a salary supplement of
$5,000 for local administrative district judges in counties
with more than five district courts.
Fiscal Analysis
There are seven counties, Harris, Dallas, Bexar, Tarrant, El
Paso, Travis and Hidalgo, which have more than five district
courts.
Methodolgy
The cost to the state for providing a $5,000 supplement to seven
local administrative district judges would be $35,000 annually.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage
is estimated as follows:
Five Year Impact:
Fiscal Year Probable Change in Number
Savings/(Cost) of State
from General Employees from
Revenue Fund FY 1997
0001
1998 ($35,000) 0.0
1998 (35,000) 0.0
2000 (35,000) 0.0
2001 (35,000) 0.0
2002 (35,000) 0.0
Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
General Revenue Related Funds
Funds
1998 ($35,000)
1999 (35,000)
2000 (35,000)
2001 (35,000)
2002 (35,000)
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government
is anticipated.
Source: Agencies:
LBB Staff: JK ,PE ,DC