LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  May 28, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Bob Bullock            Honorable James E. "Pete" Laney
          Lieutenant Governor                Speaker of the House
          Senate
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB2777 ( Relating 
to eligibility determination and service delivery of health 
and human services.) this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB2777-Conference Committee Report
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
negative impact of $(3,004,598) to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The bill would require the Health and Human Services Commission 
(HHSC) to develop and implement a plan for the integration of 
eligibility determination functions and service delivery by 
health and human services agencies, the Workforce Commission 
and other agencies, subject to the approval of the Legislative 
Budget Board and the Governor.  The bill would create a new 
legislative oversight committee to advise HHSC and monitor the 
implementation of the plan. The committee would be allowed to 
use staff of appropriate legislative committees and state agencies 
in carrying out its responsibilities.  The bill would authorize 
the commission to utilize the staff and resources of agencies 
whose programs are included in the plan.

The bill would authorize 
HHSC to contract for implementation for part or parts of the 
plan upon receipt of any necessary federal approval, subject 
to the approval of the Legislative Budget Board and Governor. 
 The bill would require HHSC to perform a detailed cost-benefit 
analysis before awarding a contract.  The bill would authorize 
financing through the issuance of bonds or obligations pursuant 
to Article 601d, V.A.C.S. for the design, development, and operation 
of an automated data processing system to support the eligibility 
determination and service delivery plan.  The bill would authorize 
the commission to use resulting savings to further develop the 
integrated system and to provide other health and human services 
subject to any spending limitation in the General Appropriations 
Act.
 
Methodolgy
 
1.  Consultant Costs:  Estimates provided by HHSC assume that 
funding will be shifted from the Department of Health, Department 
of Human Services and Workforce Commission during the 1998-99 
biennium to fund the consultant costs related to the development 
of the plan.  Estimated general revenue costs of management 
consultants in the 1998-99 would total $4.25 million (with an 
equal amount of matching federal funds) and be funded by TDH, 
DHS and TWC.   HHSC assumes that these contracts will be funded 
through savings related to streamlining of work processes rather 
than by new funding.  Consultants would be responsible for management 
and process engineering, legal assistance, policy development, 
and independent validation and verification.
2.  Additional 
HHSC Staff:  HHSC would hire three new employees; an associate 
commissioner, systems analyst, and attorney.  Costs to the state 
for these employees, which would be funded equally with state 
and federal monies, would be $264,700 the first year and approximately 
$245,000 in subsequent years.  
3.   Additional costs for plan 
development would be paid through existing resources for items 
such as site readiness preparation, public outreach, employee 
training, lease close-outs, automation procurement development 
for the Request for Proposal and system specifications.  During 
the 2000-01 biennium, systems development and automation would 
be financed with bonds and redirected savings. 
4.  System 
acquisition is assumed to be financed through bonds or the Master 
Lease Program.  The first bond issuance of $30 million would 
require debt service payments of $2.75 million in fiscal year 
1999.  Debt service in subsequent years would be $5.5 million 
annually.   A second bond issuance of $40 million would require 
debt service of $3.66 million beginning in fiscal year 2000 
with debt service of $7.3 million annually in subsequent years. 
 HHSC assumes that the debt will be retired with general revenue 
funds, although federal matching funds may be available for 
a portion of the debt.
5.  Savings:  According to the HHSC, 
the integration of eligibility determination and service delivery 
would identify some overlap which could require closure of some 
offices and some reduction in state employees.  HHSC estimates 
that by fiscal year 2002, the number of offices could be reduced 
by 35 percent and the number of employees could be reduced by 
33 percent.  Further, HHSC estimates that savings could total 
$125 million annually in all funds when the system is implemented 
statewide.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Probable           Change in Number   
            Savings/(Cost)     Savings/(Cost)     of State                                                
            from General       from Federal Funds Employees from                                          
            Revenue Fund                          FY 1997                                                 
            0001               0555                                                                        
       1998        ($132,351)        ($132,351)               3.0                                    
       1998       (2,872,247)         (125,126)               3.0                                    
       2000       (9,282,697)         (125,626)               3.0                                    
       2001      (12,944,526)         (124,626)               3.0                                    
       2002      (12,943,526)         (126,626)               3.0                                    
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 

 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998           ($132,351)
               1999          (2,872,247)
               2000          (9,282,697)
               2001         (12,944,526)
               2002         (12,943,526)
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government 
is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   529   Health and Human Services Commission
                                         324   Department of Human Services
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,BB ,AZ