LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session April 1, 1997 TO: Honorable Toby Goodman, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 3281 Committee on Juvenile Justice and Family Issues By: Goodman House Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB3281 ( Relating to streamlining local court processing for child support cases, contracting for certain child support enforcement functions, strengthening the license suspension program in child support enforcement, expanding the "most wanted" program, and improving the filing of child support liens.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB3281-As Introduced Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net positive impact of $1,539,180 to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. The bill would streamline local court processing for child support cases, provide for contracting for certain child support enforcement functions, strengthen the license suspension program in child support enforcement, expand the "most wanted" program, and improve the filing of child support liens. This bill would create a Child Support Privatization Council. This new Council would divide the state into six to ten regions and award collection contracts to a selected attorney in each region to enforce and collect child support on IV-D cases that are not in compliance within 120 days from the date an order or agreement is entered. The bill would require that those eligible to bid on the private contracts be attorneys with not less than 5 years of experience in the legal enforcement of large-scale collections. The term of the collections contracts would be required to be for at least 4 years. The bill would provide that a fee of 15 percent of the total collections would be paid to the private contractor. The fee would be collectable for 5 years or during the time an obligor remains in material compliance with the order, whichever is shorter. Fiscal Analysis The bill would require the Office of the Attorney General and the Department of Protective and Regulatory Services to develop a pilot program which includes processes for automated court processing systems for family law cases, including child support and foster care cases. Preference would be given to Bexar and Harris Counties in the awarding of grants by the Office of Court Administration. The Comptroller of Public Accounts recommended in "Disturbing the Peace," page 387, that $1,000,000 from Child Support Retained Collections be appropriated to the Office of Court Administration from the Child Support Retained Collections Account for purposes of the pilot program. Federal standards for procuring private support enforcement services provide that "all procurement transactions shall be conducted in a manner to provide, to the maximum extent possible, open and free competition" (45 Code of Federal Regulations 74.43). The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) states in their assessment of fiscal implications that "Section 233.006 of this bill likely violates federal regulations relating to competitive procurement and therefore jeopardizes federal financial participation in any payments going to the private contractors." Private contractors handling IV-D cases are required to adhere to federal regulations that are imposed upon the OAG as Texas's IV-D agency, including case-processing time frames and automation requirements. To comply with federal regulations, private collection contractors would have to use the new child support computer system, and an automated two-way case transfer process would need to be developed. Legal actions filed by the private contractor must be recorded on the child support automated system and distinguished from other legal actions of the OAG. Methodolgy In order to estimate a potential impact to the state Retained Collections Account (based on the fee structure outlined in the legislation), the following assumptions were made: * the OAG states that several provisions of this bill (e.g., length of contract, contractor eligibility, a flat 15 percent fee) "likely will be interpreted as a violation of regulations" because they do not meet federal competitive procurement regulations and, therefore, federal matching funds for payments to private contractors would not be available. However, this estimate assumes that such funds would be available at the current 66 percent to 34 percent federal-to-state match rate; * 75 percent of referrals would be non-Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (not receiving public assistance) based on IV-D cases with court orders, i.e., for every 50,000 cases referred, 37,500 would be non-TANF and 12,500 would be TANF; * 50 percent of all cases would average paying $200 a month for total collections of $60,000,000 per year; * fees to private collectors, at 15 percent, would be $9,000,000 per year with the state paying 34 percent of that total (except in FY 1998, where a six-month start-up time was assumed); * the state Retained Collections Account would receive 37.7 percent of total TANF collections; * as collections increase on TANF referrals, recipients would move off public assistance, decreasing TANF collections (and the state Retained Collections account balance) each year; * the rate of recipients moving off public assistance would increase approximately 10 percent per year (with a six-month start-up time in FY 1998), and reach a 40 percent total "move-off" rate by fiscal year 2000, at which point the rate would remain unchanged in following years; * payments to private contractors would be made from child support retained collections; * the OAG estimates that additional programming to implement the two-way case transfer process would be $539,000 for fiscal year 1998 only. The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Five Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Probable Gain/(Loss) from Savings/(Cost) General Revenue from General Fund--Child Revenue Support Retained Fund--Child Collections Support Retained Collections 0001 0001 1998 $2,974,530 ($3,069,000) 1998 4,693,650 (3,060,000) 2000 4,410,900 (3,060,000) 2001 4,410,900 (3,060,000) 2002 4,410,900 (3,060,000) Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds: The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds during each of the first five years is estimated as follows: Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative) General Revenue Related Funds Funds 1998 ($94,470) 1999 1,633,650 2000 1,350,900 2001 1,350,900 2002 1,350,900 Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Agencies: 405 Department of Public Safety 501 Department of Health 530 Department of Protective and Regulatory Services 324 Department of Human Services 302 Office of the Attorney General 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: JK ,CB ,JC