LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
April 24, 1997
TO: Honorable Steven Wolens, Chair IN RE: House Bill No. 3576
Committee on State Affairs By: Stiles
House
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HB3576 ( Relating
to state agencies use of special mail services.) this office
has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HB3576-As Introduced
The bill could result in a significant savings to the state.
The amount of savings would depend on the extent to which state
agencies use alternative, lower cost mail services and the amount
of the anticipated increase in postage rates charged by the
United States Postal Service.
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would allow state agencies to utilize
any form of mailing service available from the United States
Postal Service (USPS), such as alternative special mailing services,
for the purpose of lowering postage costs, provided such service
is consistent with the level of accountability, timeliness,
security, and quality of service with mailing services otherwise
specified in state law.
Methodology
It is anticipated
that postal rates for certified, return-receipt-requested mail
will increase, thereby increasing postage costs for state agencies.
The use by state agencies of alternative mailing methods could
offset this increase. The amount of the cost offset would depend
on the extent to which state agencies use alternative mail services
and the actual rates adopted by the USPS.
For example, if
postage rates increase as anticipated and state agencies use
priority delivery confirmation instead of certified/return receipt
mail service, the expected cost increase could be reduced by
an estimated $330,000 per year. This savings would accrue to
various state funds. In addition, it is projected that the
Department of Public Safety could save as much as $666,000 per
year for the mailing of drivers licenses if the Department is
allowed to use alternative address change methods.
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source: Agencies: 303 General Services Commission
LBB Staff: JK ,JD ,RN