LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
March 5, 1997
TO: Honorable Barry Telford, Chair IN RE: House Joint Resolution
No. 8, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Committee on Pensions and Investments By: Stiles
House
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HJR8 ( Proposing
a constitutional amendment to extend the full faith and credit
of the state to support the Texas tomorrow fund.) this office
has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HJR8-Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The cost
to the state for publication of the resolution is $71,000.
The resolution would propose a constitutional amendment to establish
the Texas Tomorrow Fund (fund) as a constitutional trust fund,
extend the full faith and credit of Texas to the fund, and allow
fund assets to be invested in accordance with the prudent person
rule. The fund would be dedicated to the prepayment of tuition
and fees for higher education under the prepaid higher education
tuition program.
In the event there was not enough money
in the fund to pay the tuition and fees for a beneficiary, the
resolution would require the first money that came into the
State Treasury that was not appropriated by the Constitution
to be transferred to the fund to pay the tuition and required
fees.
By extending the full faith and credit guarantee, the
resolution would provide an additional degree of financial assurance
to contract purchasers. The Texas Veterans Land Board loan
programs and the Hinson-Hazelwood student loan programs have
the full faith and credit guarantee of the state. These guarantees
have never been used.
The fund was designed to be and is
operating in a self-supporting manner as a trust fund. By establishing
the Texas Tomorrow Fund and allowing contracts to be written
the Legislature has, in effect, created an implied state guarantee.
Almost all successful and effective trust funds manage
their assets under the prudent person rule. The rule would
allow the fund to, over the long term, provide superior investment
returns and, thus, lower payments to contract purchasers of
a fund plan.
The proposed constitutional amendment would
be submitted to the voters at an election to be held November
4, 1997.
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source: Agencies:
LBB Staff: JK ,PE