LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  March 2, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Senfronia Thompson, Chair            IN RE:  House Joint Resolution
                                                                No. 24
          Committee on Judicial Affairs                              By: Thompson
          House
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on HJR24 ( Proposing 
a constitutional amendment granting the supreme court jurisdiction 
to answer questions of law certified from the court of criminal 
appeals and granting the court of criminal appeals) this office 
has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by HJR24-As Introduced
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
negative impact of $(71,000) to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.

The joint resolution proposes a constitutional 
amendment granting the supreme court jurisdiction to answer 
questions of law certified from the court of criminal appeals 
and granting the court of criminal appeals jurisdiction to answer 
questions of law certified from the supreme court.  The voters 
would vote on the amendment on November 4, 1997.  
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The Secretary of State reports that the office must prepare, 
translate and publish the explanatory statement and send the 
Spanish mail out.
 
Methodolgy
 
The Secretary of State estimates the cost at $71,000.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Change in Number   
            Savings/(Cost)     of State                                                                   
            from General       Employees from                                                             
            Revenue Fund       FY 1997                                                                    
            0001                                                                                           
       1998         ($71,000)               0.0                                                      
       1998               0.0                                                      
       2000               0.0                                                      
       2001               0.0                                                      
       2002               0.0                                                      
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998            ($71,000)
               1999                    0
               2000                    0
               2001                    0
               2002                    0
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   307   Secretary of State
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,PE ,DC