LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  April 29, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Hugo Berlanga, Chair            IN RE:  Senate Bill No. 30, Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted
          Committee on Public Health                              By: Zaffirini
          House
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB30 ( Relating 
to fraud and improper payments under the state Medicaid program 
and other welfare programs; to the creation of private cause 
of action for false claims for certain government payments; 
and to the creation of a criminal offense; providing penalties.) 
this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB30-Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
positive impact of $11,448,184 to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.

The bill would implement Texas Performance Review 
(TPR) recommendations FR1 through FR11 and FR16 in Disturbing 
the Peace:  The Challenge of Change in Texas Government.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
Two estimates are contained in this fiscal note.  The first 
is discussed in text and represents estimates by TPR as laid 
out in Disturbing the Peace:  The Challenge of Change in State 
Government for Fraud Issues 1 through 11 and 16.   The second 
set of costs and savings is displayed in the fiscal note boxes 
and reflects estimates based upon input from the agencies affected 
by the provisions of the bill.  The major difference between 
the estimates relates to the implementation of the FR1 (neural 
network system) and the estimates of savings which would result. 


The components of the bill that would involve estimates 
of savings and costs include:
  1)  Sections 1.01, 1.05, 1.08, 
1.09, and 1.10 which partially implement TPR recommendation 
FR16 which would require increased collection efforts for the 
food stamp and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) 
program.  Section 1.02 would allow the Department of Human Services 
to use earned federal funds derived from recovery of welfare 
benefits granted as a result of fraud for the prevention of 
fraud.
  2)  Sections 1.03 and 1.04 which would partially implement 
TPR recommendation FR3 by increasing the federal matching funds 
for certain Medicaid reimbursable services. 
  3)  Sections 
1.06  and 1.07 which would implement TPR recommendations FR1 
and partially implement FR6.  These provisions relate to the 
coordination of referrals in order to increase the amount of 
money recovered from fraudulent and other inappropriate claims 
payments.  The bill would require HHSC to deposit the state's 
share of money collected under the provisions of the bill into 
a new, dedicated account in the State Treasury.  (NOTE: According 
to the Comptroller of Public Accounts, the creation and/or continuation 
of dedicated accounts in the General Revenue Fund could further 
restrict the legislature's ability to appropriate revenues for 
general operating purposes.)  Transfer of staff from the Department 
of Health and Department of Human Services to the Health and 
Human Services Commission is included in these provisions.  
The estimates assume increased use of a neural network system.
 
 4)  Sections 2.01, 2.02, and 2.08 which would implement TPR 
recommendation FR2 and relate to the non-emergency ambulance 
services and durable medical equipment in the Medicaid program. 
 
  5)  Sections 2.03, 2.04, 2.05, 2.06, and 2.07 which would 
implement TPR recommendation FR4 by requiring surety bonds, 
criminal background checks, revisions to the Medicaid provider 
contract, and an on-site review pilot of certain applicants 
seeking to become Medicaid providers.
  6)  Section 2.09  would 
partially implement TPR recommendation FR3 by reducing reimbursement 
code manipulation through the use of an automated system.
 
Methodolgy
 
The TPR estimates reflect their analysis as laid out in Disturbing 
the Peace:  The Challenge of Change in State Government for 
Fraud Issues 1 through 11 and 16.  General Revenue savings as 
estimated by the Comptroller of Public Accounts are:  $28,684,000 
in 1998; $51,247,000 in 1999; $75,183,000 in 2000; $86,145,000 
in 2001; and $97,584,000 in 2002.  Federal fund savings as estimated 
by the Comptroller of Public Accounts are:  $39,653,000 in 1998; 
$78,679,000 in 1999; $119,825,000 in 2000; $138,753,000 in 2001; 
and $158,584,000 in 2002.  The 1998-99 biennial savings to the 
General Revenue Fund as estimated by TPR related to implementation 
of the provisions of the bill would be $79,931,000.

The fiscal 
impact estimates (in the boxes below) include the following:
 
 1)  General Revenue costs of $62,500 are included to allow 
the Department of Criminal Justice to adapt its computer systems 
as required in Section 531.108.
  2)  Annual enforcement costs 
(GR) of $5,499 related to the provisions of the bill are included 
for the Board of Medical Examiners (and 0.1 FTE).
  3)  Costs 
related to revocation of licenses are included for the Department 
of Public Safety.  It is assumed that 3 FTEs will be added to 
provide this function.  Cost to Fund 6 in the first year is 
$270,662 and $105,478 each year thereafter. 
  4)  Costs for 
implementing the audit responsibilities and financial examinations 
by the Department of Insurance are estimated to be $107,105 
in the first year and $97,754 each year thereafter.  Two FTEs 
will be added:  Certified Financial Examiner and Insurance Technician 
IV.  The costs of this bill would be recovered by Overhead Assessment 
and Examination billings.  Because these amounts are creditable 
toward premium taxes due, there will be a reduction in the amount 
of premium taxes that would be deposited into the General Revenue 
Fund beginning in 1999 and each year thereafter.
  5)  Health 
and Human Services Commission costs are included for acquisition 
of neural network technology and assume that a 75/25 federal 
match will be available for that technology.  Additional HHSC 
staff to support Medicaid fraud investigations are included 
in these estimates and assume a phase-in before fully operational: 
 16.1 FTEs in 1998; 30.4 FTEs in 1999 and 36 FTEs each year 
thereafter.  Costs related to a hotline, general operations, 
equipment and travel are included.  The estimates assume costs 
(with approximately  62%  funded with federal dollars) of $3.7 
million in 1998; $4.3 million in 1999; and $4.8 million each 
year thereafter. Due to the transfer of utilization review staff 
from existing Medicaid operating agencies, revenue gains increase 
as compared to the introduced bill.  With this transfer and 
the requirement that all monies collected be deposited in a 
dedicated account, overpayments recouped by the operating agencies 
that were available for Medicaid expenditure are now unavailable 
for reinvestment into client services.  Gains to General Revenue 
dedicated account (and savings to Federal Funds) are included. 
 The GR dedicated gains include $17.9 million in 1998; $18.8 
million in 1999; $19.6 million in 2000; and $20.4 million each 
year thereafter. 
  6)  The fiscal implications associated 
with litigation and investigation workloads for the Office of 
the Attorney General are assumed to be absorbed within existing 
resources.  In addition, it is assumed that the OAG will coordinate 
with HHSC in order to establish Memoranda of Understanding to 
enforce the provisions the bill.  
  7)  Cost estimates related 
to the Department of Human Services relate to collection of 
overissued financial food stamp benefits and include:  development 
of electronic interfaces with the Lottery Commission, additional 
staff to work the cases; edit of existing systems and hiring 
of temporary staff to man the telephone collection program; 
addition of a WATS line; electronic interfaces with DPS and 
Parks & Wildlife for suspension of driver and hunting licenses; 
study of expedited food stamp delivery; study of wage garnishment 
and property lien; and tracking of cases turned over to private 
collection agents.  Costs (with 50% funded with federal dollars) 
total $1.2 million in 1998; $1.4 million in 1999; and $1.4 million 
each year thereafter.  Savings/gains to General Revenue due 
to increased collections are estimated to be approximately $258,000 
in 1998 and $1.1 million each year thereafter.  Staff increases 
include 14 FTEs in 1998 and 28 FTEs each year thereafter. 
 
 8)  Costs related to the Department of Health correspond to 
provider training related to billing procedures for durable 
medical equipment, travel, postage, printed materials and consultant 
costs (majority of the costs).  Total costs are estimated to 
be $5.4 million in 1998; $5.3 million in 1999; and $1.1 million 
each year thereafter.  Of these costs, approximately 10% are 
from General Revenue in the first two years and 18% each year 
thereafter.  Savings/gain to the General Revenue Fund total 
$7.9 million in 1998 and 1999 with $4.0 million each year thereafter. 


These estimates assume growth in state employees to implement 
the provisions of the bill.  The number of full-time equivalent 
positions and cost estimates have been lowered subsequent to 
the issuance of a very similar fiscal note for House Bill 2127 
due to additional information and analysis.  With this additional 
analysis, there are 12.3 fewer FTEs in 1998; 9.5 fewer FTEs 
in 1999; and 12.5 fewer FTES each year thereafter than estimated 
in the House Bill 2127 fiscal note, as introduced, on March 
19.  In addition, general revenue costs have been lowered by 
$989,632 for the 1998-99 biennium and $493,680 each year thereafter.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows (Note: A new column for the dedicated 
general revenue account has been added which has the effect 
of lowering the savings to the General Revenue Fund. However, 
overall savings have increased.):
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable (Cost)    Probable Savings   Probable (Cost)    Probable           Change in Number   
            from General       from General       from Federal Funds Savings
 from     of State          
            Revenue Fund       Revenue Fund                          Federal Funds      Employees from    
                                                                                        FY 1997           
            0001               0001               0555               0555                                  
       1998      ($2,592,119)        $8,164,402      ($7,779,232)       $35,546,160              35.2
       1998       (2,960,636)         8,943,642       (8,187,804)        39,186,266              63.5
       2000       (2,737,913)         5,071,050       (4,544,863)        40,572,004              69.1
       2001       (2,737,913)         5,071,050       (4,544,863)        41,818,004              69.1
       2002       (2,737,913)         5,071,050       (4,544,863)        41,818,004              69.1
 





 
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue   Probable  (Cost)   Probable Revenue   Probable  (Cost)   
            (Loss) from        from Texas         Gain from Texas    from State                           
            General Revenue    Department of      Department of      Highway Fund                         
            Fund               Insurance          Insurance                                               
                               Operating          Operating                                               
                               Account/           Account/                                                
                               GR-Dedicated       GR-Dedicated                                            
            0001               0036               0036               0006                                  
       1998                $0        ($107,105)          $107,105        ($270,662)                  
       1999         (107,105)          (97,754)            97,754         (105,478)                  
       2000          (97,754)          (97,754)            97,754         (105,478)                  
       2001          (97,754)          (97,754)            97,754         (105,478)                  
       2002          (97,754)          (97,754)            97,754         (105,478)                  
 
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue   
            Gain/(Loss) from                                                                              
            New - GR Dedicated                                                                            
            NEW-DED                                                                                        
       1998       $17,945,351                                                                        
       1999        18,791,188                                                                        
       2000        19,604,000                                                                        
       2001        20,358,000                                                                        
       2002        20,358,000                                                                        
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998           $5,572,283
               1999            5,875,901
               2000            2,235,383
               2001            2,235,383
               2002            2,235,383
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
There may be an impact on local courts resulting from judicial 
review of license suspensions and an increased tracking of fraud 
cases by county prosecutors.  Local governments would also have 
the same responsibility as the Office of the Attorney General 
to investigate and file on false claims.  The bill would have 
an impact on local governments to the extent that it would add 
new responsibilities not currently undertaken by local governments. 
 It is possible that local governments would have some monetary 
exposure with regard to the whistleblower provisions of the 
bill.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   529   Health and Human Services Commission
                                         324   Department of Human Services
                                         302   Office of the Attorney General
                                         503   Board of Medical Examiners
                                         304   Comptroller of Public Accounts
                                         501   Department of Health
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,BB ,AZ