LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  April 17, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair            IN RE:  Senate Bill No. 54, Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted
          Committee on Insurance                              By: Shapiro
          House
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB54 ( This 
bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.) this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB54-Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
impact of $0 to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium 
ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
This bill would allow female health care plan participants direct 
and unlimited access to an obstetrician or gynecologist without 
referral by a primary care physician.  The provisions of the 
bill also preclude health care plans from imposing a copayment 
or deductible for direct access to the services of an obstetrician 
or gynecologist unless a copayment or deductible is imposed 
for access to other heath care services provided under the plan. 
 This bill would be applicable to health maintenance organizations 
(HMOs) participating in the state managed care system beginning 
January 1, 1998.  As a result, the bill is expected to increase 
expenses to the Uniform Group Insurance Plan (UGIP) by $510,000 
in fiscal year 1999, $535,000 in fiscal year 2000, $565,000 
in fiscal year 2001, and $590,000 in fiscal year 2002.
 
Methodolgy
 
These increased costs to ERS were calculated by ERS' health 
actuary, under the following assumptions:

1.  HMO premiums 
would increase as a result of providing the coverage that is 
required by the bill.

2.  These increased premiums would 
increase expenses to UGIP.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           
            Savings/(Cost)                                                                                
            from Employee Life                                                                            
            0973                                                                                           
       1998                                                                                          
       1998         (510,000)                                                                        
       2000         (535,000)                                                                        
       2001         (565,000)                                                                        
       2002         (590,000)                                                                        
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998                   $0
               1999                    0
               2000                    0
               2001                    0
               2002                    0
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   327   Employees Retirement System
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,TH ,BK