LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  January 31, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Kenneth Armbrister, Chair            IN RE:  Senate Bill No. 73
          Committee on State Affairs                              By: Haywood
          Senate
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
         In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB73 ( Relating to
financial statements filed by judges of statutory county courts and statutory
probate courts.) this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB73-As Introduced
         
             Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net negative
impact of $30,464 to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium
ending August 31, 1999.
         
         The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis
for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
This bill gives judges of statutory county courts and statutory probate courts,
as well as candidates for these offices, a choice between filing their personal
financial statements with the Ethics Commission or with the county clerk. 
Current law requires them to file with the county clerk.  The bill would also
provide that, upon written request of a county judicial officer or candidate,
the county clerk or the Ethics Commission would remove the names of the
officer's or candidate's dependent children from the financial statement before
the statement is made available to a member of the public.  This bill would be
effective September 1, 1997.
 
Methodolgy
 
The Ethics Commission would incur costs associated with an additional part-time
Administrative Technician III to implement the provisions of the bill and one-time
capital outlay for equipment to store the original statements separate from
statements with the names of dependent children removed.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions of the bill during
each of the first  five years following passage is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable Cost to   Change in Number   
            General Revenue    of State                                                                   
            Fund               Employees from                                                             
                               FY 1997                                                                    
            0001                                                                                           
       1998         ($15,732)               0.5                                                      
       1998          (14,732)               0.5                                                      
       2000          (14,732)               0.5                                                      
       2001          (14,732)               0.5                                                      
       2002          (14,732)               0.5                                                      
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds during each
of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998            ($15,732)
               1999             (14,732)
               2000             (14,732)
               2001             (14,732)
               2002             (14,732)
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of
the bill are in effect.
          
             The bill would require the county clerk, upon written request from
the officeholder or candidate, to remove the name of dependent children
from the financial statement before the statement is made available to a
member of the public.  No significant fiscal implications to local governments are anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   356   Ethics Commission
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,JD ,JC