LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
May 14, 1997
TO: Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 84, Committee Report 2nd House, as amended
Committee on Human Services By: Moncrief
House
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB84 ( Relating
to the licensure and regulation of nursing facility administrators;
providing penalties.) this office has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB84-Committee Report 2nd House, as amended
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions
of the bill.
The bill would repeal the Texas Nursing Facility
Administrators Licensure Act (Article 4512q, Revised Statutes),
and add a new subchapter on nursing facility administration
to Chapter 242 of the Health and Safety Code. The bill contains
two articles.
The first article would authorize the Board
of Human Services to adopt rules for the licensing of nursing
facility administrators, authorize the Department of Human Services
(DHS) to administer the licensing program, and designate DHS
as the licensing agency for the healing arts under 42 U.S.C.
Section 1396g (the U.S. Social Security Act). It would continue
most of the other provisions in the current licensing law, including
a provision that requires the board to adopt rules setting reasonable
and necessary fees to cover the cost of administering the subchapter.
The
second article would only take effect if the federal government
issues a ruling that the system established under Article 1
does not comply with federal regulations. Article 2 would establish
within DHS a new Texas Board of Nursing Facility Administrators
with a slightly different membership composition from the current
board. The new board would be the designated licensing authority
for the healing arts, and the state licensing agency for nursing
facility practitioners, under the U.S. Social Security Act and
related federal regulations. Article 2 would continue most
of the other provisions in the current licensing law, including
one that requires the board to adopt rules setting reasonable
and necessary fees to cover the cost of administering the subchapter.
The
bill would not significantly alter the requirements of the current
licensing statute. Therefore, it is assumed that the bill would
not create any significant new costs or savings for the licensing
program.
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source: Agencies:
LBB Staff: JK ,BB