LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session May 14, 1997 TO: Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 84, Committee Report 2nd House, as amended Committee on Human Services By: Moncrief House Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB84 ( Relating to the licensure and regulation of nursing facility administrators; providing penalties.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB84-Committee Report 2nd House, as amended No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. The bill would repeal the Texas Nursing Facility Administrators Licensure Act (Article 4512q, Revised Statutes), and add a new subchapter on nursing facility administration to Chapter 242 of the Health and Safety Code. The bill contains two articles. The first article would authorize the Board of Human Services to adopt rules for the licensing of nursing facility administrators, authorize the Department of Human Services (DHS) to administer the licensing program, and designate DHS as the licensing agency for the healing arts under 42 U.S.C. Section 1396g (the U.S. Social Security Act). It would continue most of the other provisions in the current licensing law, including a provision that requires the board to adopt rules setting reasonable and necessary fees to cover the cost of administering the subchapter. The second article would only take effect if the federal government issues a ruling that the system established under Article 1 does not comply with federal regulations. Article 2 would establish within DHS a new Texas Board of Nursing Facility Administrators with a slightly different membership composition from the current board. The new board would be the designated licensing authority for the healing arts, and the state licensing agency for nursing facility practitioners, under the U.S. Social Security Act and related federal regulations. Article 2 would continue most of the other provisions in the current licensing law, including one that requires the board to adopt rules setting reasonable and necessary fees to cover the cost of administering the subchapter. The bill would not significantly alter the requirements of the current licensing statute. Therefore, it is assumed that the bill would not create any significant new costs or savings for the licensing program. No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Agencies: LBB Staff: JK ,BB