LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  February 28, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable David Sibley, Chair            IN RE:  Senate Bill No. 215, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
          Committee on Economic Development                              By: Nixon, Drew
          Senate
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB215 ( Relating 
to notice and protest rights of certain reimbursing employers 
under the unemployment compensation system.) this office has 
detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB215-Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
impact of $0 to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium 
ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
This bill adds Section 205.0115 to Subchapter B, Chapter 205, 
Labor Code to require that a reimbursing employer have the same 
notice and protest rights as a taxed employer in lieu of the 
person for whom the cliamant last worked under conditions which 
are set out in the bill.

This bill would not give a reimbursing 
employer the right to protection from chargeback that taxed 
employers are afforded.  It would, however, require the adjudication 
of the separation from the reimbursing employer to determine 
whether the claimant would be disqualified under the conditions 
specified in the bill.

 
Methodolgy
 
This bill would result in additional costs to modify the automated 
benefits system and investigate additional claims. The automated 
benefits system would require 200 hours in programming adjustments. 
 This is calculated as follows:

ADP Programmer II (0.1 FTE), 
at $2,757 in FY 1998 ($28,668/2080 hours = $13.7827 per hour; 
200 hours X $13.7827).

The agency estimates this bill would 
also incur the costs of investigating an additional 5,554 claims. 
 This is calculated as follows:

Claims Examiner II (2.7 FTE), 
at $56,860 per year ($22,032/2080 hours = $10.5923 per hour; 
5,368 hours X $10.5923).
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Probable           Change in Number   
            Savings/(Cost)     Savings/(Cost)     of State                                                
            from Workforce     from Workforce     Employees from                                          
            Commission         Commission         FY 1997                                                 
            Federal Account    Federal Account                                                            
            - Federal          - Federal                                                                  
            5026               5026                                                                        
       1998         ($59,617)         ($15,029)               2.8                                    
       1998          (56,860)          (14,334)                                    
       2000          (56,860)          (14,334)                                    
       2001          (56,860)          (14,334)                                    
       2002          (56,860)          (14,334)                                    
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998                   $0
               1999                    0
               2000                    0
               2001                    0
               2002                    0
 
          
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,TH