LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  February 20, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Rodney Ellis, Chair            IN RE:  Senate Bill No. 239
          Committee on Jurisprudence                              By: West, Royce
          Senate
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB239 ( Relating 
to judicial review of certain decisions about public assistance 
benefits administered by the Texas Department of Human Services.) 
this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB239-As Introduced
         

Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a 
net negative impact of $(983,869) to General Revenue Related 
Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.

The bill amends the Administrative Procedure 
Act, Chapter 2001, of the Government Code.  The granting, payment, 
denial, or withdrawal of financial or medical assistance benefits 
would no longer be exempt from declaratory judgment, court enforcement, 
and contested case provisions.  The Texas Department of Human 
Services (TDHS) and the Texas Department of Health (TDH) currently 
provide informal hearings to resolve contested denials or withdrawals 
of public assistance benefits (AFDC/TANF grants, Food Stamps 
and Medicaid).  The bill would require agencies to provide formal 
hearings, which would demand more technical review and preparation, 
including ensuring that judicial review standards are met.  
 

The bill also amends Chapter 22 of the Human Resources 
Code.  Under current law, a hearing officer's  decision on benefits 
is final.  The bill would allow applicants or recipients who 
are denied public assistance benefits in the new formal hearing 
process to appeal through the civil courts.  The Office of the 
Attorney General will require additional personnel to represent 
TDHS and TDH on such appeals in civil court.  

The bill states 
that the cost of preparing the record and the transcript may 
not be charged to the applicant for or recipient of the benefits. 
 This cost will likely be borne by TDHS and TDH.

         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The fiscal implications of the bill include the addition of 
two (2) attorneys, eight (8) paralegals, and four (4) legal 
secretaries.  Additional costs accrue from TDHS and TDH providing 
transcription services.
 
Methodolgy
 
Fiscal implications are based on the following assumptions:

1) 
 15,600 cases contested in formal hearings; 11,700 cases subject 
to appeal through the civil courts.  

2)  Assistant attorneys 
general (2) to represent agencies in 234 cases appealed in civil 
court; cost of transcript preparation at approximately $500 
per transcript. 

3)  Administrative costs will be equally 
divided between the state and the federal government.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first  five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Probable Revenue   Probable           Probable Revenue   Change in Number   
            Savings/(Cost)     Gain/(Loss) from   Savings/(Cost)     Gain/(Loss) from   of State          
            from General       General Revenue    from Federal Funds Federal Funds      Employees from    
            Revenue Fund       Fund                                                     FY 1997           
            0001               0001               0555               0555                                  
       1998        ($502,653)                $0        ($502,653)                $0              14.0
       1998         (481,216)                 0         (481,216)                 0              14.0
       2000         (481,216)                 0         (481,216)                 0              14.0
       2001         (481,216)                 0         (481,216)                 0              14.0
       2002         (481,216)                 0         (481,216)                 0              14.0
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998           ($502,653)
               1999            (481,216)
               2000            (481,216)
               2001            (481,216)
               2002            (481,216)
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
Assuming an average cost of $100 per judicial review case (234 
cases), costs to local government are expected to be insignificant. 
 


          
   Source:            Agencies:   324   Department of Human Services
                                         302   Office of the Attorney General
                                         320   Texas Workforce Commission
                                         501   Department of Health
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,BB ,PP