LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  March 19, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Judith Zaffirini, Chair            IN RE:  Senate Bill No. 359
          Committee on Health & Human Services                              By: Brown
          Senate
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB359 ( Relating 
to the continuation and operation of the Department of Protective 
and Regulatory Services, the provision of services to children 
and families, and suits affecting the parent-child relationship; 
providing penalties.) this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB359-As Introduced
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
positive impact of $9,332,761 to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The bill would provide for the continuation of the Department 
of Protective and Regulatory Services (DPRS) for the standard 
12-year Sunset review cycle.  DPRS is subject to the provisions 
of the Texas Sunset Act.  The amount set forth for the administration 
of the agency in the General Appropriation Bill, as introduced, 
($526,225,721 in fiscal year 1998 and $540,736,010 for fiscal 
year 1999) would be contingent upon passage of Senate Bill 359 
or similar legislation.  The appropriation would be financed 
from the General Revenue fund, federal funds, appropriated receipts, 
and interagency contracts, and would provide for approximately 
5,907 employees.

Implementation of two provisions in the 
bill would result in a gain to the General Revenue fund which 
cannot be estimated at this time due to a lack of historical 
data.  The first provision would require DPRS to charge licensed 
child-care facilities for reimbursement of the reasonable cost 
of providing services related to corrective action plans.  The 
second provision would authorize the Board of Protective and 
Regulatory Services to impose an administrative penalty when 
a child-care provider violates the licensing statute or a rule 
or order adopted under the licensing statute.

Implementation 
of several provisions in the bill would have no significant 
fiscal impact.  These include provisions that would improve 
contract monitoring; establish new conditions for foster care 
licensure; require the Board of Protective and Regulatory Services 
to establish a flexible response system for child abuse and 
neglect cases; and require DPRS, in consultation with the Legislative 
Budget Board, to ensure that a record is maintained of the amount 
of federal funding for child and adult protective services that 
each county receives directly from the federal government.

Implementation 
of a provision requiring DPRS to remove identifying information 
from its records when the agency determines that the respondent 
in a child abuse or neglect case did not commit child abuse 
or neglect would have a significant fiscal impact.  The effective 
date for this provision would be no later than November 1, 1997, 
when the bill would require the Board of Protective and Regulatory 
Service to adopt new rules.

Implementation of several provisions 
relating to permanency planning for children in temporary managing 
conservatorship would also have a significant fiscal impact. 
 These provisions would require the court to dismiss a suit 
filed by DPRS, which requests termination of the parent-child 
relationship or requests that the department be named conservator 
of a child, on the first Monday after the first anniversary 
of the child's placement in temporary managing conservatorship. 
 The court could extend the department's temporary managing 
conservatorship for up to 180 days under certain circumstances. 
 The effective date for these provisions would be September 
1, 1997, and the change in law would not apply to suits seeking 
termination of the parent-child relationship filed before the 
effective date.
 
Methodolgy
 
The provision requiring de-identification of records would significantly 
increase the workload of the child protective services program. 
 The department estimates that 57,000 hours of clerical staff 
time would be required annually to delete information from data 
fields in the Child and Adult Protective System (CAPS).  The 
estimate assumes that 57,000 cases would require de-identification 
each year, and that a clerk could complete the de-identification 
process for each case in one hour.

The provisions relating 
to permanency planning for children in temporary managing conservatorship 
would also significantly increase the workload of the child 
protective services program and legal staff.  It is assumed 
that the workload increase would be heaviest in fiscal year 
1998, when the department would implement new permanency planning 
procedures and begin moving a backlog of about 3,500 foster 
children who have been in conservatorship for 12 or more months 
through the court system in preparation for a final court order.

The 
cost of the additional workload would be more than offset by 
a savings in foster care and other purchased service payments. 
 DPRS estimates that 337 children would leave the foster care 
system during fiscal year 1998 due to implementation of the 
new permanency planning provisions.  The number of children 
leaving the system after 1998 would rise steadily, from 1,693 
in 1999 to nearly 2,500 in the year 2002.  This would result 
in a five-year savings of more than $110 million in foster care 
payments and $1.7 million in other purchased service payments. 
 DPRS also estimates that the number of children receiving adoption 
subsidy payments would increase by about 150 over five years 
due to implementation of the bill's provisions, and foster care 
savings have been adjusted accordingly.

Implementation of 
the bill's provisions would require additional child protective 
service workers and legal staff to handle the new permanency 
planning requirements.  These costs have been adjusted for a 
gradual implementation of the program in 1998.  The cost estimate 
uses federal revenue from the Temporary Assistance for Needy 
Families (TANF) program.  In the event that TANF funds are unavailable 
for allocation, General Revenue may need to be substituted. 
 Costs and savings may be overstated if the backlog of children 
in temporary managing conservatorship for more than 12 months, 
which is embedded in the department's model, includes lawsuits 
seeking termination of the parent-child relationship filed before 
September 1, 1997.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Probable           Probable           Probable           Change in Number   
            Savings/(Cost)     Savings/(Cost)     Savings/(Cost)     Savings/(Cost)     of State          
            from General       from General       from Federal Funds from Federal Funds Employees from    
            Revenue Fund       Revenue Fund                                             FY 1997           
            0001               0001               0555               0555                                  
       1998      ($5,321,727)        $3,156,825      ($3,949,575)        $1,641,687             224.0
       1998       (3,005,418)        14,503,081       (2,230,502)         7,542,235             139.0
       2000       (3,104,293)        16,460,143       (2,303,883)         8,559,992             141.0
       2001       (3,304,185)        18,764,019       (2,452,235)         9,758,108             147.0
       2002       (3,405,776)        21,203,445       (2,527,632)        11,026,716             149.0
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998         ($2,164,902)
               1999           11,497,663
               2000           13,355,850
               2001           15,459,834
               2002           17,797,669
 
          
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.

Implementation 
of the bill's provisions would significantly increase the workload 
of counties that provide legal representation for children in 
the temporary managing conservatorship of the Department of 
Protective and Regulatory Services.  The department estimates 
that the additional workload would cost about $4.6 million statewide 
during the first two years of the bill's implementation.  Some 
of the cost could default to the department if local prosecutors 
refuse to assume responsibility for legal representation.

Implementation 
of a provision requiring the department to develop and implement 
an outreach program to inform counties about the availability 
of federal funds to pay for child and adult protective services 
could increase federal funding for local government.  This impact 
cannot be estimated due to the lack of historical data on county 
participation rates.

          
   Source:            Agencies:   
                                         116   Sunset Advisory Commission
                                         360   State Office of Administrative Hearings
                                         530   Department of Protective and Regulatory Services
                                         655   Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,BB ,NM