LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session May 26, 1997 TO: Honorable Ron Wilson, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 432, Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted Committee on Licensing & Administrative Procedures By: Lucio House Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB432 ( relating to the regulation and operation of bingo.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB432-Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted FN Revision 1 Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net negative impact of $(5,213,446) to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. The bill would amend the Government Code to create the Texas Gaming Commission (gaming commission), which would be composed of the members of the Texas Lottery Commission, the members of the Texas Racing Commission, the Texas Bingo Commissioner, the Comptroller, the State Auditor, and the presiding officer of the Public Safety Commission. The Comptroller, the State Auditor, and the presiding officer of the Public Safety Commission, would serve as non-voting members. Fiscal Analysis The commission would be created to perform various functions for the Texas Lottery Commission, the Texas Racing Commission, and the newly-created Texas Bingo Commission. The gaming commission would be required to hold at least six meetings per year. The bill provides for offices in Austin and other areas as needed. The bill would take effect September 1, 1997. Both the new gaming commission and the new bingo commission would become subject to the Texas Sunset Act and would be abolished, unless continued, September 1, 2003. The Governor would designate one member of the gaming commission as presiding officer. The bill sets certain eligibility standards for the bingo commissioner, who would be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Governor. The bill authorizes both the gaming commission and the bingo commission to employ executive directors as at-will employees. The executive directors of the two new agencies are authorized to employ personnel as necessary. All employees would be employed as at-will employees. The bill delineates the duties of the two executive directors and sets eligibility requirements for employees. The Attorney General would be required to designate a member of the Attorney General's staff to counsel, advise, and represent the bingo commission. The gaming commission and the bingo commission would file annual reports, detailing commission activities, to the presiding officer of each house of the Legislature, the Governor, and the Legislative Budget Board. Methodolgy The Comptroller of Public Accounts estimates the bill would have no direct fiscal impact on the state. Potentially the gaming commission could require additional support staff for its initial start-up phase. However, for this estimate, no new support staff costs are assumed for implementing provisions of the bill. Also, it is assumed that compensation for the new executive directors and bingo commissioner, would be set at amounts comparable to other agencies of similar staffing and budget size. For purposes of this fiscal note, it is assumed that the new gaming commission structure would function similarly to that of the Finance Commission and its component regulatory agencies. No new staff costs have been included and it is assumed that many of the support functions could be conducted by the existing personnel currently supporting the individual regulatory functions. Any consolidation of the current regulatory services or functions by the gaming commission executive director, as authorized by the bill, could result in an actual reduction of FTE's. It is estimated the initial cost of consolidating the commissions' automated support systems, ranging from $2.5 to $6.5 million, would be the greatest potential cost factor of the bill. Costs associated with the systems consolidation would include costs for conversion and training to ensure the various systems would maintain individual operating integrity and would be made compatible with the other systems. Administrative activities, licensing functions and personnel transfers or allocations under the new structure would require a corresponding transfer in appropriations, which is not directed by the bill, but which could be implemented by a memorandum of understanding as authorized in the bill, or interagency contract(s). Under this estimate, the costs that would be incurred for the new gaming commission include, the executive director (Exempt Group 3, up to $92,070 plus $5,000 support costs), and some travel expenses. Since the new agencies would be home based in Austin, travel costs related to meetings could be minimized if meetings of the gaming commission were timed to coincide with the meetings of the member commissions. Costs would be expected for the new bingo commissioner's salary (Exempt Group 4, up to $109,080), the executive director's salary (Exempt Group 2, up to $77,760) and related support costs for those positions ($5,000 each). The gaming commission and the bingo commission are authorized to rent space in Austin and establish other branches as needed. However, this estimate assumes there is adequate space currently available in the existing operations of the Lottery Commission and Racing Commission to house the small number of staff required under the new organizational structure, and no immediate new space would be required. The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Five Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Change in Number Savings/(Cost) of State from General Employees from Revenue Fund FY 1997 0001 1998 ($4,864,223) 3.0 1998 (349,223) 3.0 2000 (349,223) 3.0 2001 (349,223) 3.0 2002 (349,223) 3.0 Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds: The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds during each of the first five years is estimated as follows: Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative) General Revenue Related Funds Funds 1998 ($4,864,223) 1999 (349,223) 2000 (349,223) 2001 (349,223) 2002 (349,223) Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Agencies: 476 Racing Commission LBB Staff: JK ,TH ,PH