LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  February 12, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Kenneth Armbrister, Chair            IN RE:  Senate Bill No. 461
          Committee on State Affairs                              By: Moncrief
          Senate
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB461 ( Relating 
to the authority of the comptroller to contract for certain 
tax collection services.) this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB461-As Introduced
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
positive impact of $40,127,000 to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The bill would authorize the Comptroller to contract with an 
appropriate vendor to develop and implement an advanced database 
system to enhance tax collections.  The contract would provide 
that the vendor developing and implementing the system receive 
compensation through a contingency fee determined from a percentage 
of the revenue, not to exceed a stated amount, deposited into 
the State Treasury from audit and enforcement actions taken 
by the Comptroller as a result of cases identified by the vendor's 
system.

The bill would authorize the Comptroller to contract 
with an appropriate person to perform tax audits in states that 
are not covered by Comptroller field offices.  The contract 
would provide that the person performing the audits receive 
compensation through a contingency fee determined from a percentage 
of the revenue, not to exceed a stated amount, deposited into 
the State Treasury as a result of the audits.
 
Methodolgy
 
The state would receive additional revenue from audit payments, 
collections through enforcement actions, and enhanced voluntary 
compliance. 
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue   Change in Number   
            Gain/(Loss) from   of State                                                                   
            General Revenue    Employees from                                                             
            Fund               FY 1997                                                                    
            0001                                                                                           
       1998        $3,210,000               0.0                                                      
       1998        36,917,000               0.0                                                      
       2000        47,328,000               0.0                                                      
       2001        59,567,000               0.0                                                      
       2002        74,665,000               0.0                                                      
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998           $3,210,000
               1999           36,917,000
               2000           47,328,000
               2001           59,567,000
               2002           74,665,000
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
If a taxpayer, delinquent in state taxes, was also delinquent 
in local taxes, the comptroller would attempt to collect the 
delinquent local taxes on behalf of the appropriate locality 
or localities.  The comptroller would not attempt to collect 
delinquent local taxes from a taxpayer who was not also delinquent 
in state taxes.  Consequently, the potential exists for units 
of local government to receive a revenue gain due to increased 
collection of delinquent local taxes.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   304   Comptroller of Public Accounts
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,JD ,RN