LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  April 24, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Teel Bivins, Chair            IN RE:  Senate Bill No. 598, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
          Committee on Education                              By: Wentworth
          Senate
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB598 ( Relating 
to the expulsion or placement in alternative education programs 
of public school students who assault school employees, officers, 
or volunteers.) this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB598-Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
positive impact of $10,074,400 to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would include the offense of assault as a behavior 
for which a student may be placed in an alternative education 
program or for which a student may be expelled, including offenses 
of assault against public school personnel. The bill would make 
no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation 
of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
Under the current Education Code, districts are required to 
place students in a district alternative education program (AEP) 
for committing a felony assault. The bill would add provision 
for permitting districts also to place students in an AEP for 
misdemeanor assault, or to expel students from school for either 
felony or misdemeanor assault, and would make provision for 
assault-related offenses against school personnel under the 
Penal Code.

Student expulsions that do not require juvenile 
justice or other alternative education programs could reduce 
costs to the Foundation School Program as a result of reduced 
attendance in regular or alternative education programs. 

The 
bill would permit but not require expulsions. 
 
 
Methodolgy
 
No data is available on placement of students in alternative 
education programs for the offense of assault. During 1995-96 
districts reported a total of 16,132 students in AEPs for on-campus 
felony offenses related to assault, controlled substances, or 
certain offensive public behaviors, as required under the Safe 
Schools statute. Additional data from the TEA report filed for 
the federal programs under the 1995-96 Safe and Drug-Free Schools 
and Communities Act shows a statewide total of 4,112 assaults 
against teachers or staff.  Incidents of school-related gang 
violence totaled 5,750; incidences of assaults against other 
students totaled 47,942. For the purposes of conservative estimates 
on this bill, student assaults against teachers or other school 
staff will be assumed as the type of assaults for which students 
might be expelled by a school district; and, it is assumed that, 
statewide, the number of assaults totaled represents the actual 
number of students committing the assaults.   To estimate the 
effect of reduced attendance due to student expulsions, a typical 
student would generate a funding requirement for approximately 
$4,900 per year. If it is presumed that expulsions would occur 
at any point during the year, then the average reduced attendance 
which would result from this bill will be estimated at half 
a school year, or 90 days. The annual savings, therefore, would 
average about $2,450 per student expelled.   Assuming a district 
expulsion rate of 50%, then half of the students committing 
assault against teachers (2,056) would be expelled for half 
of the school year ($2,450 per pupil expelled) to total approximately 
$5,037,200 in annual savings. For the purposes of this estimate, 
total savings are attributed to the state; at the local level, 
significant savings are to be realized per student costs in 
alternative education programs.
 
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first  five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           
            Savings/(Cost)                                                                                
            from Foundation                                                                               
            School Fund                                                                                   
            0193                                                                                           
       1998        $5,037,200                                                                        
       1998         5,037,200                                                                        
       2000         5,037,200                                                                        
       2001         5,037,200                                                                        
       2002         5,037,200                                                                        
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 

 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998           $5,037,200
               1999            5,037,200
               2000            5,037,200
               2001            5,037,200
               2002            5,037,200
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
Some savings to units of local government could be realized 
based on local school district costs for alternative education 
programs, from which students are more likely to be expelled 
than from regular education programs. For example, based on 
1994-95 Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) 
data, alternative campus total operating costs in school districts 
across Harris County ranged from $6000 to over $32,000 per student 
enrolled (not including special education). Therefore, student 
expulsions from AEPs in some districts could represent significant 
savings.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   701   Texas Education Agency - Administration
                                         665   Juvenile Probation Commission
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,LP ,TH