LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session April 24, 1997 TO: Honorable Hugo Berlanga, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 609, As Engrossed Committee on Public Health By: Madla House Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB609 ( Relating to the regulation of pharmacies and pharmacists; providing a penalty.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB609-As Engrossed Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net impact of $0 to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. Fiscal Analysis The bill would allow the Texas State Board of Pharmacy to issue standards for recognition and approval of training programs for pharmacy technicians, and to maintain a list of training programs that meet these standards. The bill would also allow the Texas State Board of Pharmacy to require a licensee who has been placed on probation to pay the board a probation fee to defer the costs of monitoring the licensee during probation. The effective date for the bill would be September 1, 1997, and the provisions of the bill would apply only to licenses issued on or after this date. Methodolgy The board reports that there are 20 pharmacy technician training programs in the state and projects that this number will increase by 10 percent through the year 2002. Implementation of the provision allowing the board to issue standards for these programs would require a one-time cost of $10,000 for consultant services, and on-going costs of approximately $10,000 per year to visit and approve the programs. Utilizing a provision in current law, the board would charge each approved program $500 per year to defray the on-going costs. This would generate approximately $10,000 in new revenue during each full year of operation. The board reports that 95 licensees are placed on probation each year. The board also reports that it would require one full-time pharmacist to monitor this number of licensees. The costs associated with the new position would be approximately $55,000 per year, plus one-time costs during the first year to purchase equipment for the new staff member. The board would set the monthly probation fee at $50 per licensee to cover these costs. This would generate approximately $57,000 in new revenue during each full year of operation. Costs and revenues have been adjusted for mid-year implementation in fiscal year 1998. The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Five Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Probable Change in Number Savings/(Cost) Savings/(Cost) of State from Pharmacy from Pharmacy Employees from Board Operating Board Operating FY 1997 Account/ Account/ GR-Dedicated GR-Dedicated 0523 0523 1998 ($49,539) $28,500 0.5 1998 (64,898) 67,000 1.0 2000 (65,398) 67,500 1.0 2001 (65,398) 67,500 1.0 2002 (65,898) 68,000 1.0 Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds: Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative) General Revenue Related Funds Funds 1998 $0 1999 0 2000 0 2001 0 2002 0 Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Agencies: 302 Office of the Attorney General 501 Department of Health 515 Board of Pharmacy LBB Staff: JK ,BB