LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  April 11, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Allen Place, Chair            IN RE:  Senate Bill No. 627, As Engrossed
          Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence                              By: Sibley
          House
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB627 ( Relating 
to certification of bail bondsmen by the Texas Department of 
Licensing and Regulation; providing a penalty.) this office 
has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB627-As Engrossed
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
positive impact of $116,710 to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
This bill requires the Department of Licensing and Regulation 
(TDLR) to register bail bondsmen and provides for criminal penalties 
for related violations.  The certification of bail bondsmen 
would be administered through an examination provided through 
the Department and through continuing education requirements. 
 In addition, this bill provides for the creation of the Bail 
Bondsman Advisory Council to serve as an advisory committee 
to the Department.  

The fiscal impacts related to this bill 
relate primarily to the examinations and certification requirements.
 
Methodolgy
 
It is assumed that approximately 400 bail bondsmen per year 
would renew their registrations at $120 per year.  In the first 
year, all examinees would be required to take the examination 
at $100 per exam.  As a result, 1,000 examinees (800 existing 
plus 200 new) are expected in 1998.  This would decrease to 
100 in 1999. The number of examinees would decrease to 50 per 
year in future years.  Travel costs are assumed at a total of 
$5,000 per meeting for 9 members.  For 2 meetings per year, 
the estimate is $10,000.  The agency would require 3 additional 
FTEs at an annual cost of $60,936 primarily for exam administration.

The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Probable Revenue   Change in Number   
            Savings/(Cost)     Gain/(Loss) from   of State                                                
            from General       General Revenue    Employees from                                          
            Revenue Fund       Fund               FY 1997                                                 
            0001               0001                                                                        
       1998        ($134,180)          $244,000               3.0                                    
       1998         (118,310)           125,200               3.0                                    
       2000         (118,310)           110,600               3.0                                    
       2001         (118,310)           129,800               3.0                                    
       2002         (118,310)           129,800               3.0                                    
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 

 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998             $109,820
               1999                6,890
               2000              (7,710)
               2001               11,490
               2002               11,490
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   
                                         452   Department of Licensing and Regulation
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,CB ,JD ,RA