LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
May 6, 1997
TO: Honorable Fred Hill, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 657, Committee Report 2nd House, as amended
Committee on Urban Affairs By: Barrientos
House
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB657 ( Relating
to the creation of intermunicipal commuter rail districts; authorizing
a tax; granting the authority to issue bonds and power of eminent
domain.) this office has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB657-Committee Report 2nd House, as amended
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
This bill would allow a commuter rail district to be created
between Austin and San Antonio. Any county adjacent to either
Bexar or Travis Counties would be eligible to join the district,
as well as any municipalities with populations over 18,000 located
within such eligible counties. A board would be appointed to
manage and operate the district, and the district would have
the authority to issue bonds and collect user fees.
There
could be some cost to municipalities and counties which opt
to join a commuter rail district. Those costs would be dependent
on preliminary studies, negotiations, and acquisitions required
to create the district. Once a district is created, a local
government could incur costs associated with the financing of
transportation infrastructure constructed within the territory
of the local government, if the local government agrees to such
expenses.
There could be a nominal loss in property tax revenues
to local governments which levy property taxes as a result of
this bill's passage, since property acquired by such districts
would be exempt from such taxes. A local government, other
than a school district, could agree to forego up to 30 percent
of increased ad valorem tax collections that are attributable
to increased value of property resulting from an infrastructure
project. Such revenues would be transferred to the commuter
rail district, but would be designated for use within the territory
of the local government.
A local government could be required
to forego local sales and use taxes generated from items sold
on district property, since such taxes would be remitted by
the Comptroller to the district. However, no existing sales
and use tax revenues are anticipated to be affected.
Source: Agencies:
LBB Staff: JK ,TL