LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
March 13, 1997
TO: Honorable David Sibley, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 747
Committee on Economic Development By: Sibley
Senate
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB747 ( Relating
to the administration and financing of certain industrial development
corporations.) this office has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB747-As Introduced
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions
of the bill.
The bill would amend the Development Corporation
Act of 1979 (act) to provide additional flexibility to municipalities
with industrial development corporations. The fiscal impact
on the state and on local governments would vary depending on
which cities and counties enacted taxes under the provisions
of the bill.
Similar annual fiscal implications METHODOLOGY
The fiscal
impact on the state and on local governments in reduced property
tax revenue would vary depending on which cities enacted the
provisions of the bill and converted taxable property to exempt
"public-use property." Article 5190.6, Development Corporation
Act, Section 4B. (k) provides a property tax exemption for all
approved projects owned, used and held by an eligible municipality.
The exemption is based on a provision that defines all such
projects as "public-use property" which is exempt from ad valorem
taxes.
Section 403.302, Government Code, requires the Comptroller
to conduct a property value study to determine the total taxable
value for each school district. Total taxable value is an element
in the state's school funding formula. Passage of the bill
could cause a reduction in a school district's taxable values
reported to the Commissioner of Education by the Comptroller.
When
calculating state aid for public education, the state must recognize
the loss in local property value due to exemptions granted to
qualified organizations within the school district. Depending
on a school district's wealth per student, this could result
in an increased cost to state-funded public education.
The
fiscal impact on the state would depend on the number and amount
of local taxable property removed from the local tax rolls due
to being converted to public-use property, but it is possible
to provide a hypothetical example of such an impact. In a hypothetical
school district that qualifies for both tier-one and tier-two
state aid for public education, it would cost the state one
dollar for each dollar of local school district property tax
revenue loss due to the provisions of the bill. In such a hypothetical
school district in which, for example, $100 million of taxable
property would be converted to public-use property, the probable
cost to General Revenue-related funds during each fiscal year
that the property remained off the local tax rolls would be
$1.5 million, based on a tax rate of $1.50 per $100 of valuation.
FISCAL
IMPACT
The fiscal impact on the state and on local governments
would vary depending on which cities and counties enacted taxes
under the provisions of the bill.
Source: Agencies: 465 Department of Commerce
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: JK ,TH ,BR