LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
April 7, 1997
TO: Honorable Chris Harris, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 984
Committee on Administration By: Gallegos
Senate
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB984 ( Relating
to the preservation, operation, and maintenance of historical
resources and the powers and duties of the Texas Historical
Commission.) this office has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB984-As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions
of the bill.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The bill would transfer control
and management of the State Cemetery and other burial grounds
from the General Services Commission to the Historical Commission.
The bill would also require that the Preservation Board consult
with the Historical Commission on matters related to historic
preservation.
The bill would amend Section 442.005 of the
Government Code to allow the Historical Commission to (1) provide
loans for the preservation of historic structures; (2) enter
into contracts with federal or local government agencies; (3)
accept donations of services to carry out its purposes; (3)
participate in the establishment and operation of an affiliated
non-profit organization and contract with the organization to
perform any of its duties. The bill would also amend Section
442.0086 of the Government Code, relating to the military sites
program, to require the commission to preserve, interpret, and
place monuments at historic military sites and would allow the
commission to seek federal assistance in carrying out duties
related to military sites. The bill would take effect September
1, 1997.
METHODOLOGY
The General Services Commission has
budgeted $282,132 and 7 FTEs in fiscal year 1997 for maintenance
and operation of the State Cemetery. Assuming that 1) the transfer
would not result in significant additional costs, 2) the Historical
Commission could maintain and operate the State Cemetery for
the same amount of funding as the General Services Commission,
and 3) that funds and FTEs already budgeted for the State Cemetery
would be transferred to the Historical Commission, the transfer
of the State Cemetery should not result in any significant additional
costs to the state.
There are no costs associated with the
remaining provisions of the bill.
LOCAL
No fiscal implication to units of local government is
anticipated.
Source: Agencies: 809 Preservation Board
808 Historical Commission
303 General Services Commission
LBB Staff: JK ,RR ,JA