LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session April 10, 1997 TO: Honorable Kenneth Armbrister, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 1102 Committee on State Affairs By: Armbrister Senate Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1102 ( Relating to systems and programs administered by the Employees Retirement System of Texas.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1102-As Introduced No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. This bill makes numerous changes to the statutes governing the Employees Retirement System (ERS), the Law Enforcement and Custodial Officers Supplemental Retirement Fund (LECOSRF), the Judicial Retirement System Plan One, and the Judicial Retirement System Plan Two, as well as the administration of the Uniform Group Insurance Program. Many of these changes affect the administration of ERS programs and have no fiscal or actuarial impact. Among the changes that will have an actuarial impact are the increased annuity given to ERS members retiring in fiscal years 1997, 1998, and 1999, and changes in retirement eligibility requirements, rules regarding purchase of service credit for military service, and rules for receiving service credit for unused sick leave. ERS projects that implementing the provisions of this bill would increase the actuarial liabilities of the ERS by $161.7 million, and increase the actuarial liabilities of the LECOSRF by $10.1 million. The normal cost for ERS would increase from 12.305% to 12.480%, or approximately $7.5 million a year. The normal cost for LECOSRF would increase from 2.358% to 2.389%, or approximately $300,000 a year. Both funds currently have an actuarial surplus sufficient to absorb the increase in liabilities. Therefore, an increase in state contributions would not be required. The bill gives the ERS Board of Trustees the authority to permanently increase the benefits formula multiplier from 2.0% to 2.25% if the actuary certifies that the system would remain actuarially sound, with an amortization period not exceeding thirty years. The ERS actuary projects that this increase could not be done under the current contribution rates; therefore, no formula increase was included in the analysis. No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Agencies: 454 Department of Insurance 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: JK ,JD ,SC