LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
April 10, 1997
TO: Honorable Kenneth Armbrister, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 1102
Committee on State Affairs By: Armbrister
Senate
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1102 ( Relating
to systems and programs administered by the Employees Retirement
System of Texas.) this office has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1102-As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
This bill makes numerous changes to the statutes governing the
Employees Retirement System (ERS), the Law Enforcement and Custodial
Officers Supplemental Retirement Fund (LECOSRF), the Judicial
Retirement System Plan One, and the Judicial Retirement System
Plan Two, as well as the administration of the Uniform Group
Insurance Program. Many of these changes affect the administration
of ERS programs and have no fiscal or actuarial impact. Among
the changes that will have an actuarial impact are the increased
annuity given to ERS members retiring in fiscal years 1997,
1998, and 1999, and changes in retirement eligibility requirements,
rules regarding purchase of service credit for military service,
and rules for receiving service credit for unused sick leave.
ERS
projects that implementing the provisions of this bill would
increase the actuarial liabilities of the ERS by $161.7 million,
and increase the actuarial liabilities of the LECOSRF by $10.1
million. The normal cost for ERS would increase from 12.305%
to 12.480%, or approximately $7.5 million a year. The normal
cost for LECOSRF would increase from 2.358% to 2.389%, or approximately
$300,000 a year. Both funds currently have an actuarial surplus
sufficient to absorb the increase in liabilities. Therefore,
an increase in state contributions would not be required.
The
bill gives the ERS Board of Trustees the authority to permanently
increase the benefits formula multiplier from 2.0% to 2.25%
if the actuary certifies that the system would remain actuarially
sound, with an amortization period not exceeding thirty years.
The ERS actuary projects that this increase could not be done
under the current contribution rates; therefore, no formula
increase was included in the analysis.
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source: Agencies: 454 Department of Insurance
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: JK ,JD ,SC