LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  March 25, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Kenneth Armbrister, Chair            IN RE:  Senate Bill No. 1131
          Committee on State Affairs                              By: Ellis
          Senate
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1131 ( Relating 
to the regulation of cosmetologists; providing an administrative 
penalty.) this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1131-As Introduced
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
positive impact of $7,372,000 to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
This bill would amend Article 8451a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes 
to double the current cosmetology licensing fees, and give the 
Cosmetology Commission the authority to assess administrative 
penalties for violations of the Cosmetology Act.

This bill 
would take effect September 1, 1997.
 
Methodolgy
 
The estimated gain in revenue assumes there would not be a decline 
in the number of licensees as a result of the fee increase. 
 The estimate is derived by multiplying estimated annual fee 
collections for fiscal year 1997 by two and holding that amount 
constant over the five year period.  The estimate assumes there 
will be small amounts of administrative penalties deposited 
to the General Revenue as the provisions of the bill are enforced.

Based 
on the Cosmetology Commission's Legislative Appropriations Request, 
implementing the provisions of this bill would require an increase 
in staff of 16.5 enforcement staff and 5.5 licensing staff and 
associated operating costs, including cost for administrative 
hearings. The higher costs in FY1998 are due to one time equipment 
purchases.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue   Probable           Change in Number   
            Gain/(Loss) from   Savings/(Cost)     of State                                                
            General Revenue    from General       Employees from                                          
            Fund               Revenue Fund       FY 1997                                                 
            0001               0001                                                                        
       1998        $4,710,000      ($1,097,000)              22.0                                    
       1998         4,710,000         (951,000)              22.0                                    
       2000         4,710,000         (951,000)              22.0                                    
       2001         4,710,000         (951,000)              22.0                                    
       2002         4,710,000         (951,000)              22.0                                    
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998           $3,613,000
               1999            3,759,000
               2000            3,759,000
               2001            3,759,000
               2002            3,759,000
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   360   State Office of Administrative Hearings
                                         505   Cosmotology Commission
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,JD ,CG