LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
May 6, 1997
TO: Honorable Paul Sadler, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 1158, As Engrossed
Committee on Public Education By: Luna,Gregory
House
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1158 ( Relating
to regional education service centers.) this office has detemined
the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1158-As Engrossed
No significant fiscal implication to the state is anticipated.
Bill Summary
This bill would reauthorize and redirect the
regional education service centers (ESCs) by amending Chapter
8 of the Texas Education Code. The bill would expand their
focus from the provision of "core services" to include assisting
schools in improving student performance and enabling schools
to operate more efficiently and economically. It would also
provide more centralization in the management of ESCs and allocate
more power and authority in this sphere to the commissioner.
It would take effect immediately, except for Section 8.121
dealing with funding, which would take effect September 1, 1997
(existing ESC funding expires on August 31, 1997).
The bill
delineates the following changes:
It would allow the commissioner
(rather than the Texas Education Agency) to establish and operate
a system of regional ESCs and to adopt rules for the membership
of ESC boards (rather than the State Board of Education (SBOE)).
The commissioner would select the number of centers, locations,
boundaries, and the allocation of state and federal funds among
centers (current law limits the number of ESCs to 20). Data
reporting requirements and accountability standards, the minimum
of which are specified in the bill, also would be established
by the commissioner. The board of directors would not be involved
in program planning and evaluation (as they are under current
law) but would be required to adopt a budget after conducting
a public hearing on the center's performance during the preceding
year.
Districts would not be required to purchase services
from ESCs or a specific ESC but be would be free do so from
any of them. In addition to improving student performance,
the mission of ESCs would be to help districts operate more
efficiently and economically and to implement initiatives assigned
by the legislature or commissioner. ESCs would continue to
provide core services, such as training teachers and assisting
specific needs of academically low-performing schools.
The
bill would exempt ESCs and their employees from taxation in
the same manner as school districts and their employees. It
would also provide immunity from liability to ESC employees/volunteers
to the same extent as district employees/volunteers. It would
allow ESCs to credit accumulated personal leave by a center
employee who was formerly a state or school district employee
(and vice versa). With the commissioner's approval, ESCs would
be able to purchase, lease, or sell property and acquire debt.
ESCs would have to submit to the commissioner a yearly improvement
plan that must include services to be provided to low performing
campuses and services to enable districts to operate more economically.
An annual performance evaluation conducted by the commissioner
would include a review of client satisfaction. The commissioner
(rather than the SBOE) would develop a system of sanctions for
ESCs that are deficient in performance.
In the section
outlining the powers of the SBOE with regard to ESC, the bill
would eliminate the role of the SBOE in the adoption of rules
for the ESC board and the receipt and expenditure of grants.
Several former ESC functions relating to reporting and performance
contracting for additional services to districts would be eliminated
by the bill.
The commissioner would fund ESCs based on
services provided to improve student performance, including
a minimum allotment and an additional amount based on number
of campuses served. The ESC statewide total allotment may not
be less than .4 percent of the amount appropriated to the Foundation
School Program. The commissioner would be authorized to establish
and allocate an incentive fund for ESCs to encourage efficiency.
Funds for legislative initiatives and innovative and emergency
grants may be appropriated by the legislature.
Fiscal Analysis
No
significant fiscal impact to the state is anticipated. The
modification of ESC responsibilities and services that are specified
in the bill would be accomplished with existing personnel and
resources.
The bill specifies that funding could not be less
than .4 percent of the amount appropriated to the Foundation
School Program (FSP). Assuming that the FSP appropriation is
about $9 billion, the ESC allocation would be not less than
about $36 million, and is estimated to be approximately $40
to $42 million. Currently, the legislature appropriates $23
million from the Foundation School Fund (FSF) for the provision
of core services and the general administration of the centers.
Another $17 to $19 million is expended from other state sources
($11 million from general revenue and $8 million from the Telecommunications
Infrastructure Fund for the long-range technology plan).
This
bill would consolidate most funding so that it would be allocated
from one source in the FSP. However, it would authorize specific
legislative appropriation from other sources. There would be
no net fiscal impact to the state as a result of this bill.
Administrative Costs to Local Government
This bill is designed
to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness in the provision
of educational services by school districts by allowing more
district flexibility in their selection of an ESC or other entities
to provide educational services. This could result in a cost
savings to districts, but these costs savings would vary depending
on local choices and are not anticipated to be significant.
The fiscal implications noted above would be likely to
continue beyond 2002.
Source: Agencies: 701 Texas Education Agency - Administration
LBB Staff: JK ,DH ,LP ,GJ