LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session April 7, 1997 TO: Honorable J.E. "Buster" Brown, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 1339 Committee on Natural Resources By: Patterson, Jerry Senate Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1339 ( Relating to coastal erosion; including the power of eminent domain.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1339-As Introduced No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. Contingent upon legislative appropriation for coastal erosion planning and response, the bill would authorize the General Land Office (GLO) to carry out activities set out in the bill. The bill would repeal the current statutes on coastal erosion and create a new subchapter, the Coastal Erosion Planning and Response Act. This bill would create the Coastal Erosion Response Fund in the State Treasury to receive all money appropriated for the purposes of this bill and to receive money from other sources intended for erosion response activity. Use of the fund would be limited to activities relating to the cause and control of shoreline erosion. In addition, grants could be issued to local governments for erosion response activities. The promulgation of rules for erosion response within the coastal zone would be authorized. GLO would be required to submit a biennial report to the Legislature on coastal erosion planning and response activities. Landowner consent would be needed before erosion response activities could be undertaken on private property or on Permanent School Fund (PSF) land. The state would be granted immunity from actions rising from the conduct of erosion response activities; the bill would, however, provide for judicial review of rights affected by certain erosion response activities. The bill would require proof of claim when a person claims title to PSF land as a result of certain changes within the coastal zone. Corrections could also be made to local tax records in instances when property becomes submerged due to erosion and title to land is vested from a landowner to the Permanent School Fund. The bill would become effective immediately. Contingent upon appropriation to the GLO for erosion response activities, the bill would allow local governmental entities to apply for and receive grant funding to conduct erosion response activities. The bill would allow a local government to use grant funding as a match in seeking other funding. The GLO, may however, establish cost share requirements for any proposed project or grant. Local governments could lose certain property from their tax rolls to the PSF if the property becomes submerged due to erosion. Source: Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts 305 General Land Office and Veterans' Land Board LBB Staff: JK ,BB ,NT