LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session May 1, 1997 TO: Honorable Irma Rangel, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 1485, Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted Committee on Higher Education By: Bivins House Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1485 ( Relating to the tuition charged to certain students at public institutions of higher education and to state funding related to those students.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1485-Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net positive impact of $30,200,000 to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. Fiscal Analysis The bill would require the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to exclude, for formula funding purposes, the semester credit hours of resident undergraduate students that had previously attempted 170 or more credit hours. The bill would provide certain exemptions. This section would apply to funding for 1998-99. The bill would allow the institutions to charge an increased tuition, without exceeding the out-of-state tuition rate, for students who had attempted 170 or more credit hours, beginning with the fall semester 1997. The bill would authorize tuition rebates of up to $1,000 for Texas resident students who earned an undergraduate degree by attempting no more than six hours above the minimum credit hours required for that program. The bill would require the institutions to pay the tuition rebates from their local funds and would authorize institutions to receive general revenue reimbursements during the appropriations process, effective for students who enter a baccalaureate degree program on or after September 1, 1997. The bill would limit the credit hour requirements for undergraduate degree programs to 120 unless exceptions are provided by the Coordinating Board. Methodolgy Undergraduate Semester Credit Hour Cap The Coordinating Board estimates that the number of semester credit hours in excess of 170 adjusted for the exceptions provided by the bill is 125,000, or 4,167 full-time equivalent students that would be eliminated from formula funding each year. The average general revenue contribution for each upper division student is $3,807. Therefore, the savings associated with this provision would be $15,900,000 for each year for the 1998-99 biennium as indicated in the table below. Savings in the subsequent biennia would probably be less as students change their behavior regarding their degree plan. For purposes of the fiscal note, it is estimated that the savings would decrease by $2 million per year beginning in fiscal year 2000. Not all of the savings would be realized by institutions of higher education. Certain savings associated with employee benefits would accrue to the Teacher Retirement System and Comptroller of Public Accounts. Using an alternative method, the Texas Performance Review estimated the general revenue the savings to be $7,556,000 for the 1998-99 biennium. From FY2000 and beyond these savings were adjusted to $4,640,000 to reflect the increased efficiency of institutions to graduate more students in a timely manner. Institutions could charge these students tuition at the higher nonresident rate to offset the loss of general revenue formula funding. Therefore, there would be no additional impact related to the all funds methodology of higher education funding. Tuition Rebate The Coordinating Board estimates that approximately 55,000 students earn baccalaureate degrees from Texas public universities each year and that about 24 percent of these students would be eligible for the tuition rebate in 2002. Therefore, 11,000 students would be eligible for the tuition rebate. The Coordinating Board also estimates that because of the rebate students would take fewer semester credit hours which would result in 4,583 fewer full-time student equivalents enrolling. The Coordinating Board estimates the net impact of this provision would be a savings to general revenue of $4.25 million in FY2002. The Texas Performance Review did not estimate the fiscal impact related to the tuition rebate. Administrative Costs To implement the undergraduate cap and the tuition rebate programs there would be certain administrative and record keeping costs at each institution to ensure that the appropriate tuition was charged and rebates provided. It is estimated that the initial cost of establishing the necessary record keeping system to be approximately $4 per student in FY1998. There are approximately 400,000 students enrolled at public universities. Ongoing costs are not estimated to be significant. The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Five Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Probable Probable Savings/(Cost) Savings/(Cost) Savings/(Cost) from General from General from General Revenue Fund for Revenue Fund for Revenue Fund for 170 Semester Tuition Rebates Administrative Credit Hour Cap Costs 0001 0001 0001 1998 $15,900,000 $0 ($1,600,000) 1998 15,900,000 0 0 2000 13,900,000 0 0 2001 11,900,000 0 0 2002 9,900,000 4,250,000 0 Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds: The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds during each of the first five years is estimated as follows: Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative) General Revenue Related Funds Funds 1998 $14,300,000 1999 15,900,000 2000 13,900,000 2001 11,900,000 2002 14,150,000 Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Agencies: 781 Higher Education Coordinating Board 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: JK ,LP ,LD