LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
April 25, 1997
TO: Honorable Judith Zaffirini, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 1539, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Committee on Health & Human Services By: West Royce
Senate
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1539 ( Relating
to the regulation of certain facilities, homes, and agencies
that provide child care and of child-care administrators; providing
penalties.) this office has detemined the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1539-Committee Report 1st House, Substituted FN Revision 1
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net
positive impact of $981,302 to General Revenue Related Funds
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions
of the bill.
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would require the Department of Protective and Regulatory
Services (PRS) to conduct background and criminal history checks
on owners, operators, employees, and regular visitors associated
with regulated child-care facilities and family homes. PRS
would conduct the background and criminal history checks when
an application is filed to operate a child-care facility or
family home, and at least once every 24 months after a facility
or home is licensed or registered. Each check must include
a search of child abuse and neglect reports maintained by PRS,
and a search of criminal history record information made available
by the Department of Public Safety (DPS) under Section 411.114
of the Government Code, or by the Federal Bureau of Investigations
(FBI) or another criminal justice agency under Section 411.087
of the Government Code. PRS by rule must require each child-care
facility or family home to pay a fee that does not exceed the
administrative costs the department incurs in conducting the
background and criminal history check.
The effective date
for the bill would be September 1, 1997.
Methodolgy
PRS reports that it conducted nearly 48,000 background and criminal
history checks relating to persons associated with regulated
child-care facilities and family homes in fiscal year 1996.
These checks were conducted at no cost to the facility or home.
It is assumed that implementation of the provision requiring
child-care facilities and family homes to pay a fee in an amount
not to exceed the department's administrative costs would generate
new revenue with no additional costs.
PRS reports that implementation
of the provision requiring background and criminal history checks
at least once every 24 months would encompass nearly 29,000
regulated child-care facilities and family homes, with the number
of persons checked per facility ranging from 2 in a small agency
foster family home to 30 in a large child-care institution.
It is assumed that implementation of this provision would require
PRS to check the background and criminal history of 67,823 persons
associated with regulated child-care facilities and family homes
each year. It is also assumed that most of these checks would
not duplicate the department's current workload.
PRS estimates
that one staff person could search 15,000 records each year.
It is assumed that 2% of the child abuse/neglect searches and
1% of the criminal history searches would result in a positive
match requiring additional staff time to fully document and
act on the case. PRS would need 21.9 additional FTE positions
to accommodate the workload associated with the new requirement
for biennial background and criminal history checks. First
year costs and revenues have been reduced by 25% to give the
department time to adopt rules and phase-in the new program.
It
is assumed that PRS would charge a fee to recover the administrative
costs associated with the background and criminal history check
requirement. These would include staffing costs, a $1 fee for
DPS criminal history searches, and a $24 fee for FBI fingerprint
searches (which would be conducted on a very small number of
individuals).
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage
is estimated as follows:
Five Year Impact:
Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
General Revenue Related Funds
Funds
1998 $490,651
1999 490,651
2000 490,651
2001 490,651
2002 490,651
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source: Agencies:
530 Department of Protective and Regulatory Services
LBB Staff: JK ,BB ,NM