LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
April 26, 1997
TO: Honorable Rodney Ellis, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 1561
Committee on Jurisprudence By: Wentworth
Senate
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1561 ( Relating
to recording certain depositions.) this office has detemined
the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1561-As Introduced
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a
net negative impact of $(377,782) to General Revenue Related
Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
Fiscal Analysis
According to the Court Reporters Certification Board, of the
3,448 certified court reporters in the state, there are an estimated
2,743 freelance court reporters who record depositions. Under
the provisions of the bill, these freelance reporters would
not be required to be examined, certified, or disciplined by
the agency.
Methodolgy
Based on current fee projections, the agency predicts that it
could lose up to 90% of collected fee revenue ($165,970) in
even-numbered years and 80% of collected fee revenue ($211,812)
in odd-numbered years. The number fluctuates due to the higher
number of certification renewals processed in odd-numbered years.
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage
is estimated as follows:
Five Year Impact:
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue
Gain/(Loss) from
General Revenue
Fund
0001
1998 ($165,970)
1998 (211,812)
2000 (165,970)
2001 (211,000)
2002 (165,000)
Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
General Revenue Related Funds
Funds
1998 ($165,970)
1999 (211,812)
2000 (165,970)
2001 (211,000)
2002 (165,000)
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government
is anticipated.
Source: Agencies:
LBB Staff: JK ,BB ,MG