LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session March 26, 1997 TO: Honorable Teel Bivins, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 1577 Committee on Education By: Bivins Senate Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1577 ( Relating to public postsecondary technical and vocational education, to the programs, operation and administration of the Texas State Technical College System.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1577-As Introduced Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net negative impact of $(50,070,000) to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. Fiscal Analysis This bill would (1) define the mission of TSTC; (2) designate the Marshall Extension Center as a campus; (3) allow the transfer of the extension centers in Abilene, Breckenridge and Brownwood to nearby community colleges; (4) direct the Coordinating Board to modify funding formulas to cover the special costs associated with highly specialized advanced and emerging technical or vocational programs; and (5) direct the Coordinating Board to establish a grants program to assist a public technical institute or junior college to cover the costs for the start-up or expansion of programs in a highly specialized advanced or emerging technical field. Methodolgy This bill would limit TSTC to offering only those academic courses required for accreditation. There would be no fiscal impact to the state because academic courses not offered by TSTC would be offered by a nearby community college. Funding based on contact hours would be appropriated to whichever institution was offering the course. In designating the Marshall Extension Center as a campus, the TSTC System estimates that the addition of 1 FTE would be needed to administer student financial aid at a cost of 35,000 each year. The transfer of the extension centers in the bill is not mandatory. If the transfers did occur, there could be cost savings associated with transferring the physical plant costs to either the community college or to the corporation authorized under Sections 10, 11 and 12 of this bill. It is assumed that the Marshall campus, including the three buildings currently used on that campus, would be transferred at no cost and with no debt to the TSTC System. It is assumed that the mission of that campus would not be significantly expanded and there will be no need for additional facilities in the near future. It is assumed that while there may be some shift of student enrollments, the net cost to the state of enrollment changes will be zero. Costs for maintenance, operations and utilities are included in the proposed 1998-99 appropriations bill and there would be no additional costs due to this bill. The bill would direct the Higher Education Coordinating Board to modify the funding formulas to provide a higher level of funding for highly specialized advanced and emerging technologies. The level of funding provided to support this provision would be dependent upon legislative action. It is estimated that $12.5 million per year would support this initiative. The bill would also establish a grant program to be administered by the Higher Education Coordinating Board. Again, the level of funding provided to support this provision would be dependent upon legislative action. It is estimated that $12.5 million per year would support this initiative. Costs for the Coordinating Board to administer the grant program could be funded from these amounts. The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Five Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Change in Number Savings/(Cost) of State from General Employees from Revenue Fund FY 1997 0001 1998 ($25,035,000) 1.0 1998 (25,035,000) 1.0 2000 (25,035,000) 1.0 2001 (25,035,000) 1.0 2002 (25,035,000) 1.0 Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds: The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds during each of the first five years is estimated as follows: Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative) General Revenue Related Funds Funds 1998 ($25,035,000) 1999 (25,035,000) 2000 (25,035,000) 2001 (25,035,000) 2002 (25,035,000) Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as the provisions of the bill are in effect. No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Agencies: LBB Staff: JK ,LP ,DB