LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE
75th Regular Session
April 15, 1997
TO: Honorable Teel Bivins, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 1653
Committee on Education By: Nelson
Senate
Austin, Texas
FROM: John Keel, Director
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1653 ( Relating
to campus or campus program charters.) this office has detemined
the following:
Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1653-As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions
of the bill.
Bill Summary
The bill would amend Section
12.054 of the Texas Education Code (TEC) to add certain powers
and duties to campuses that receive a campus charter. Among
the delineated powers are the following: control over spending;
the power to hire, organize, train, and release staff; control
over instructional strategies and methodologies; freedom to
organize the campus or program schedule and teacher and student
assignments; freedom to extend performance standards beyond
those required by the local school board or state; and freedom
to devise specific means to demonstrate their accountability
to their communities beyond those means required by the state
or local school district.
The bill would also add a new section
to the TEC to allow a campus applying for a campus charter to
appeal a decision of a local board of education to the commissioner
of education. The governor would have the authority to overrule
the commissioner s decision.
This legislation would take
effect September 1, 1997.
State Fiscal Impact
The Texas
Education Agency would incur additional administrative costs
related to the appeals process described above, but these costs
are not anticipated to be significant and would be absorbed
in the agency's existing budget.
These costs are detailed
as follows: The commissioner of education could rule on applications
for campus charters. There are currently less than 10 campuses
with a campus charter; however, the changes made in the bill
to the delegated powers and duties of campus charters are expected
to increase the number of campus charter requests. If 10 percent
of the 6,600 campuses apply for a charter, and 10 percent of
those are denied and file an appeal with the commissioner of
education, TEA would process 66 appeals per year. This would
not entail a significant additional cost burden to the state.
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
The financing of the campus charter program is fully integrated
within the existing public school financing system and this
bill would not affect this system.
Source: Agencies: 701 Texas Education Agency - Administration
LBB Staff: JK ,LP ,GJ