LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  April 3, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Kenneth Armbrister, Chair            IN RE:  Senate Bill No. 1768
          Committee on State Affairs                              By: Cain
          Senate
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1768 ( Relating 
to the abolition of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and 
to the transfer of its powers and duties to the Railroad Commission 
of Texas.) this office has detemined the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1768-As Introduced
         
Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net 
positive impact of $2,348,412 to General Revenue Related Funds 
through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.
         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
This bill would eliminate the Public Utility Commission (PUC) 
and transfer the agency's responsibilities to the Railroad Commission. 
 It is anticipated that savings would be incurred through elimination 
of duplicated administrative overhead and executive positions. 
 Total savings to General Revenue would be $1,174,581 in FY 
1998 and $1,173,831 in FYs 1999 through 2002.
 
Methodolgy
 
Cost savings were calculated using the following assumptions:

(1) 
The following positions would be eliminated: the three Commissioners, 
one Executive Director, and one Director of Administration. 
 Total savings to General Revenue from elimination of these 
positions would be $459,951 in FY 1998 and $459,951 in FYs 1999 
through 2002.  In addition to these five positions, approximately 
16 "indirect" positions would also be eliminated.  Costs savings 
are included in indirect cost savings.

(2) 50% of PUC's indirect 
costs as estimated in the proposed 1998-1999 appropriation for 
PUC would be eliminated.  Total savings would be $714,630 in 
FY 1998, and $713,880 in FYs 1999 through 2002. 
The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:
 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable           Change in Number   
            Savings/(Cost)     of State                                                                   
            from General       Employees from                                                             
            Revenue Fund       FY 1997                                                                    
            0001                                                                                           
       1998        $1,174,581              21.0                                                      
       1998         1,173,831              21.0                                                      
       2000         1,173,831              21.0                                                      
       2001         1,173,831              21.0                                                      
       2002         1,173,831              21.0                                                      
 
 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 
The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds 
during each of the first five years is estimated as follows:
 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998           $1,174,581
               1999            1,173,831
               2000            1,173,831
               2001            1,173,831
               2002            1,173,831
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   455   Railroad Commission
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,JD ,BK