LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE 75th Regular Session April 21, 1997 TO: Honorable Rodney Ellis, Chair IN RE: Senate Bill No. 1786 Committee on Jurisprudence By: Cain Senate Austin, Texas FROM: John Keel, Director In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1786 ( Relating to project contract claims against a unit of state government.) this office has detemined the following: Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1786-As Introduced Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a net negative impact of $(1,161,155) to General Revenue Related Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. Fiscal Analysis The bill would amend the Civil Practice and Remedies Code by adding new provisions to allow certain contractors to file contract claims against the state, except the Texas Department of Transportation, by filing a claim with the state agency. A contractor who files a claim with a state agency would be allowed to appeal an agency decision and request an administrative hearing with the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH), a form of alternative dispute resolution for state agencies. Agencies would be represented by the Office of the Attorney General (OAG). Methodolgy The Office of the Attorney General states that the bill would provide a new cause of action against the state. In addition, the OAG expects that the availability of a new remedy would allow contractors to more readily seek relief through the hearings process, since the state would waive sovereign immunity in cases filed under these new provisions. There is no estimate included as to the possible increased State exposure to liability due to sovereign immunity being waived in such cases. The OAG anticipates that its Tort Litigation Division would require four additional attorneys and four support staff to handle the new construction contracts/administrative appeals. The OAG estimates that there could be approximately 8,856 additional hours billed to the new litigation. The SOAH estimates that it would bill each referring agency approximately $21,000 for each case referred, based on prior experience in hearing construction cases. This figure is based on SOAH's $70 per hour billing rate and includes billable hours related to prehearing proceedings, reviewing testimony, ruling on discovery disputes, holding the hearing on the merits, reviewing post hearing briefs and reply briefs, and drafting a proposal for decision for submission to the referring agency. The fiscal impact of the administrative hearings would be to each agency referring cases to SOAH. The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage is estimated as follows: Five Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Change in Number Savings/(Cost) of State from General Employees from Revenue Fund FY 1997 0001 1998 ($598,700) 8.0 1998 (562,455) 8.0 2000 (562,455) 8.0 2001 (562,455) 8.0 2002 (562,455) 8.0 Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds: The probable fiscal implication to General Revenue related funds during each of the first five years is estimated as follows: Fiscal Year Probable Net Postive/(Negative) General Revenue Related Funds Funds 1998 ($598,700) 1999 (562,455) 2000 (562,455) 2001 (562,455) 2002 (562,455) No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source: Agencies: 302 Office of the Attorney General 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts 360 State Office of Administrative Hearings LBB Staff: JK ,BB ,JC