LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
                                   Austin, Texas
         
                                   FISCAL NOTE
                               75th Regular Session
         
                                  May 8, 1997
         
         
      TO: Honorable Warren Chisum, Chair            IN RE:  Senate Bill No. 1910, As Engrossed
          Committee on Environmental Regulation                              By: Ratliff
          House
          Austin, Texas
         
         
         
         
         FROM:  John Keel, Director    
         
In response to your request for a Fiscal Note on SB1910 ( Relating 
to the regulation of poultry operations.) this office has detemined 
the following:
         
         Biennial Net Impact to General Revenue Funds by SB1910-As Engrossed
         

Implementing the provisions of the bill would result in a 
net negative impact of $(374,097) to General Revenue Related 
Funds through the biennium ending August 31, 1999.
         
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal 
basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions 
of the bill.

         
 
Fiscal Analysis
 
The bill would amend the Water Code by adding regulations for 
poultry operations. The Texas Natural Resource Conservation 
Commission (TNRCC) would be authorized to assess a fee not to 
exceed $50 per year for the registration of operators of poultry 
facilities and transporters of poultry carcasses.  

The bill 
would provide the TNRCC with the authority to develop and enforce 
rules regarding handling and disposal of poultry carcasses. 
 The rulemaking authority of the TNRCC would be effective March 
1, 1999;  otherwise, the bill would take effect on March 1,1998.
 
Methodolgy
 

The TNRCC estimates collecting $50,000 a year from fees assessed 
annually on an estimated 1,000 entities required to register 
under this bill.  The TNRCC would require two additional FTEs 
to process registrations and fee payments and two FTEs to conduct 
field inspections and enforcement activities.

The probable fiscal implications of implementing the provisions 
of the bill during each of the first five years following passage 
is estimated as follows:

 
Five Year Impact:
 
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue   Probable           Change in Number   
            Gain/(Loss) from   Savings/(Cost)     of State                                                
            General Revenue    from General       Employees from                                          
            Fund               Revenue Fund       FY 1997                                                 
            0001               0001                                                                        
       1998           $50,000        ($166,699)               2.0                                    
       1998            50,000         (307,398)               4.0                                    
       2000            50,000         (272,398)               4.0                                    
       2001            50,000         (272,398)               4.0                                    
       2002            50,000         (272,398)               4.0                                    
 


 
         Net Impact on General Revenue Related Funds:
 

 
              Fiscal Year      Probable Net Postive/(Negative)
                               General Revenue Related Funds
                                             Funds
               1998           ($116,699)
               1999            (257,398)
               2000            (222,398)
               2001            (222,398)
               2002            (222,398)
 
Similar annual fiscal implications would continue as long as 
the provisions of the bill are in effect.
          
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
          
   Source:            Agencies:   582   Natural Resources Conservation Commission
                                         
                      LBB Staff:   JK ,BB ,NT