SRC-AXB H.B. 3836 76(R)   BILL ANALYSIS


Senate Research Center   H.B. 3836
By: Truitt (Ellis)
Intergovernmental Relations
5/13/1999
Engrossed


DIGEST 

On April 8, 1999, in the case of Scott Bradley v. The State of Texas on the
Relation of Dale White, the Supreme Court of Texas ruled in favor of
Bradley, a mayor who was unlawfully removed from office through Section
21.002(f), Local Government Code. Some officials in small towns have used
this statute to put colleagues on trial, using vague procedures and
allowing themselves to act as judges, jury, and witnesses. H.B. 3836
clarifies the removal proceedings for members of the governing body of a
general-law municipality. 
 
PURPOSE

As proposed, H.B. 3836 clarifies the removal proceedings for members of the
governing body of a general-law municipality. 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

This bill does not grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state
officer, institution, or agency. 

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

SECTION 1. Amends Chapter 21, Local Government Code, by designating Section
21.001 as Subchapter A and adding a heading, as follows:  

SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

SECTION 2. Amends Chapter 21, Local Government Code, by adding Subchapter
B, as follows:  

SUBCHAPTER B. REMOVAL OF MEMBER OF GOVERNING BODY OF GENERAL-LAW
MUNICIPALITY  

Sec. 21.021. APPLICABILITY. Provides that this subchapter applies only to a
general-law municipality.  

Sec. 21.022. DEFINITIONS. Defines "district attorney," "incompetency,"
"officer," and "official misconduct."  

Sec. 21.023. REMOVAL FROM OFFICE. Authorizes the district judge to remove
an officer of the municipality from office.  

Sec. 21.024. NO REMOVAL BEFORE ACTION. Prohibits an officer from being
removed for an act the officer committed before election to office.  

Sec. 21.025. GENERAL GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL. Authorizes an officer to be
removed from office for incompetency, official misconduct, or intoxication
on or off duty caused by drinking an alcoholic beverage. Provides that
intoxication is not a ground for removal if it appears at the trial that
the intoxication was caused by drinking an alcoholic beverage on the
direction and prescription of a licensed physician practicing in this
state.  

Sec. 21.026. PETITION FOR REMOVAL. Provides that a proceeding for the
removal of an  officer is begun by filing a written petition for removal in
a district court in the county in which the officer resides. Authorizes any
resident of the municipality who has lived for at least six months in the
municipality and who is not currently under indictment in the county in
which the municipality is located to file the petition. Requires at least
one of the parties who files the petition to swear to it at or before the
filing. Requires the petition to be addressed to the district judge of the
court in which it is filed, to specify the grounds alleged for the removal
of the officer in plain and intelligible language, and to cite the time and
place of the occurrence of each act alleged as a ground for removal with as
much certainty as the nature of the case permits.  

Sec. 21.027. CITATION OF OFFICER.  Requires the person filing the petition
to apply to the district judge in writing for an order requiring a citation
and a certified copy of the petition to be served on the officer.
Prohibits action, if the application for the order is made during the term
of the court, from being taken on the petition until the order is granted
and entered in the minutes of the court. Requires the judge, if the
application is made during the vacation of the court, to indicate on the
petition the action taken and to have the action entered in the minutes of
the court at the next term.  Requires the petition, if the judge refuses to
issue the order for citation, to be dismissed at the cost of the person
filing the petition. Prohibits the person from taking an appeal from the
judge's decision or applying for a writ of mandamus. Requires the clerk, if
the judge grants the order for citation, to issue the citation with a
certified copy of the petition. Requires the judge to require the person
filing the petition to post security for costs in the manner provided for
other cases.  Requires the citation to order the officer to appear and
answer the petition on a date, fixed by the judge, after the fifth day
after the date the citation is served. Provides that the time is computed
as is in other suits. Requires disposition of this action by the district
court to take precedence over other civil matters on the court's docket.  

Sec. 21.028. BOND.  Requires the judge to require the person filing the
petition to execute a bond, with at least two good and sufficient sureties,
in an amount fixed by the judge and conditioned as required by the judge.
Requires the bond to be used to pay damages and costs to the officer if the
grounds for removal are found at trial to be insufficient or untrue.
Requires the officer to serve written notice on the person who filed the
petition and that person's bondsman within 90 days of the execution of the
bond stating that the officer intends to hold them liable on the bond and
stating the grounds for that liability.  Requires the person filing the
petition, if the final judgment establishes the officer's right to the
office, to pay the officer an amount determined by the judge as appropriate
to compensate the officer for the damages suffered as a result of the
removal action.  

Sec. 21.029. TRIAL. Requires an officer to have the right to trial by jury.
Requires the trial for the removal of an officer and the proceedings
connected with the trial to be conducted as much as possible in accordance
with the rules and practice of the court in other civil cases, in the name
of the State of Texas, and on the relation of the person filing the
petition. Prohibits the judge, in a removal case, from submitting special
issues to the jury. Requires the judge, under a proper charge applicable to
the facts of the case, to instruct the jury to find from the evidence
whether the grounds for removal alleged in the petition are true. Requires
the jury, if the petition alleges more than one ground for removal, to
indicate in the verdict which grounds are sustained by the evidence and
which are not sustained. Requires the district attorney to represent the
state in a proceeding for the removal of an officer.  

Sec. 21.030. APPEAL. Authorizes either party to a removal action to appeal
the final judgment to the court of appeals in the manner provide for other
civil cases. Provides that the officer is not required to post an appeal
bond but may be required to post a bond for costs. Provides that an appeal
of a removal action takes precedence over the ordinary business of the
court of appeals, and requires the appeal to be decided with all convenient
dispatch. Requires the court of appeals, if the trial court judgment is not
set aside or suspended, to issue its mandate in the case not later than the
fifth day after the date the court renders its judgment.  

Sec. 21.031. REMOVAL BY CRIMINAL CONVICTION. Provides that the conviction
of  an officer by a petit jury for any felony or for a misdemeanor
involving official misconduct operates as an immediate removal from office.
Requires the court rendering judgment in the case to include in the
judgment an order removing the officer. Provides that if the removed
officer appeals the judgment, the appeal supersedes the order of removal
unless the court that renders the judgment finds that it is in the public
interest to suspend the removed officer pending the appeal. Requires the
court, if the court finds that the public interest requires suspension, to
suspend the removed officer.  

Sec. 21.032. REELECTION PROHIBITED FOR CERTAIN PERIOD. Provides that an
officer removed is not eligible for reelection to the same office before
the second anniversary of the date of the removal.  

SECTION 3. Repealer: Section 21.002 (Removal of Mayor or Alderman in
General-Law Municipality), Local Government Code.  

SECTION 4. Makes application of this Act prospective.

SECTION 5. Effective date: September 1, 1999.

SECTION 6. Emergency clause.